Better not be article 5.
Which NATO nation was attacked to use Article 5?
Better not be article 5.
Better not be article 5.
Better not be article 5.
Why would it be? Russia hasn't attacked Turkey.
I was under the impression violating airspace was an act of aggression. Are they not acting in "self defense"?
I was under the impression violating airspace was an act of aggression.
You think all of NATO would go to war for a member state whose air space had simply been violated? No attack, just a plane flying around?
Mr Erdogan spoke of Turkey's "rage" at the decision to shoot down the F-4 Phantom on 22 June and described Syria as a "clear and present threat".
"A short-term border violation can never be a pretext for an attack," he said. The Turkish jet was on a training flight, testing Turkey's radars in the eastern Mediterranean, he said.
He's just finishing the radar photoshop.
AWKWARD
Something does not add up here?
Say the jet was going slow at 500mph, that part of Turkey is about 2 miles wide.
How can you issue 10 warnings in 15 seconds! At that speed you would cover
2 miles in about 15 seconds.
Hope this is not the most expensive 15 seconds in history.
Something does not add up here?
Say the jet was going slow at 500mph, that part of Turkey is about 2 miles wide.
How can you issue 10 warnings in 15 seconds! At that speed you would cover
2 miles in about 15 seconds.
Hope this is not the most expensive 15 seconds in history.