• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Ryzen "2" ?

Hotwired said:
Didn't they stop doing that?
Click to expand...

No, they havn't. The Ryzen1000x's had a 20c offset, the Ryzen2000x's have a 10c offset. It dosn't matter to be honest as long as peeps realize which is the actual temp and which is the offset temp. The only reason it's there is to bring the cpu fan speed up earlier during the heat up stage, in other words it forces the cpu to believe it is hotter thaan it actually is.
 
All core clocks seem a little outdated given the boosts this thing can do. Only advantage seems to be capping the voltage lower but even so mines doing 1.25v all core at 4114. Single core does hit 1.469 but that seems well within Ryzen + tolerances.
 
Bizarre, had some cores boosting to 4488 today.....:eek:

ZgX1Fuf.png
 
chroniclard said:
All core clocks seem a little outdated given the boosts this thing can do. Only advantage seems to be capping the voltage lower but even so mines doing 1.25v all core at 4114. Single core does hit 1.469 but that seems well within Ryzen + tolerances.
Click to expand...
Ye but You are not 100% stable are ya :D
 
Look at the Bus Clock maximum table, it reads 103.2Mhz which shouldn't happen under any circumstance considering you seem to have it set to 101Mhz. It's just a reading error on the Bus Clock and since Core Clocks are calculated based on Bus Clock x Multiplier, it gives you 103.2 x 43.5 = ~4489Mhz. HWinfo will probably get an update to fix that.
 
AndreiD said:
Look at the Bus Clock maximum table, it reads 103.2Mhz which shouldn't happen under any circumstance considering you seem to have it set to 101Mhz. It's just a reading error on the Bus Clock and since Core Clocks are calculated based on Bus Clock x Multiplier, it gives you 103.2 x 43.5 = ~4489Mhz. HWinfo will probably get an update to fix that.
Click to expand...

Makes sense. :) Max legit clock still 4393 then. :p
 
Vakas said:
I have only checked on NZXT Cam yet,

Bios seems to be fine though.

anyone using the Kraken X62?
Click to expand...

Corsair iCue (Link) shows my CPU temp at idle at around 80c, but checking in hwinfo it's around 30-35.

AFAIK Corsair are aware and a fix should be coming 'soon'.

E: H150i Pro.
 
@opethdisciple X370 should have all the features of X470 apart from PBO, which seems to be down to motherboard makers to implement. Not much reason to upgrade to X470 if you already have a good X370 motherboard.
AMD did update the memory spec in order to fix some signalling issues some X370/B350 boards had, but according to The Stilt the main limiting factor is still your chip's IMC.
 
AndreiD said:
@opethdisciple X370 should have all the features of X470 apart from PBO, which seems to be down to motherboard makers to implement. Not much reason to upgrade to X470 if you already have a good X370 motherboard.
AMD did update the memory spec in order to fix some signalling issues some X370/B350 boards had, but according to The Stilt the main limiting factor is still your chip's IMC.
Click to expand...

Thanks for that. I'm gonna have to do some research on what all the different terms mean. It kind of annoys me that it seems PBO on my Prime Pro x370 seems unstable.

But clock speed from what I can see is almost identical so meh.

I don't even overclock the chip.
 
@chroniclard
99 does not cut it in my case. Image You are rendering project for 5 hours and bam error at 70% or siomething and... You start from ZERO :S


Stess test is fun. Put it on and start doing my training :)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom