Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I load my settings after I clear cmos etc. I don’t leave bios at default because I save my fan profile etc and load this. I try again without curve optimiser and files corrupt. This must be faulty because it should work.If you are using BIOS defaults like i suggested then curve optimiser should not even be a consideration.
https://imgur.com/a/BQ1ATAh
Your old settings may no longer be stable with this kit, I don't know. Just rule that out completely and run stock and just worry about memory frequency, timings and voltage. Don't load your previous settings that were stable on a different kit.
Thank you for these.Your old settings may no longer be stable with this kit, I don't know. Just rule that out completely and run stock and just worry about memory frequency, timings and voltage. Don't load your previous settings that were stable on a different kit.
Try these timings.
DRAM VDD 1.45v
DRAM VDDQ 1.35v
Yes, it can add some frequency to the second CCD, it does nothing for the first CCD. 64GB dual rank puts more strain on the CPU, so your previous curve optimiser settings may not longer be stable.
Ahh ok I understand. It must have been another bios setting because when I load the same curve optimiser settings it’s is working now. When I load my previous saved settings it doesn’t work.
Is this something new with the VDD and VDDQ being set different in this way. I have never see this before. I don’t doubt, just curious.Your old settings may no longer be stable with this kit, I don't know. Just rule that out completely and run stock and just worry about memory frequency, timings and voltage. Don't load your previous settings that were stable on a different kit.
Try these timings.
DRAM VDD 1.45v
DRAM VDDQ 1.35v
You can set it anywhere up to 0.200v lower and it can help reduce temperatures and power drawn via the lower VDDQ. I'm running mine at 0.150mv lower than VDD.
Ah ok. This is good to know. I am fully stable after long testing with Karhu and Y cruncher with 1Usmus. I am very happy with this memory. Hopefully I can tighten even more. I hope to reach 6200
asrock seems to engage 7200mhz and ram timings and what else atm
www.reddit.com
I’m testing out the new bios atm, higher memory speeds are now possible. I’m using a DR 64GB kit though so those speeds are probably out of reach for me.asrock seems to engage 7200mhz and ram timings and what else atm
you like to jump on stuff, right?
Reddit - Dive into anything
New tech means takes time to iron out and optimize things.
Peformance wise alone it's not huge, no, the performance is gained from other factors changing. It gains the biggest benefit from temperature/power drops. Which can in turn benefit performance if it pushes your CPU into a lower temp bracket that can allow it to boost higher. For example if your CPU is running at the max temp of 89C on heavy work loads, using a negative CO can reduce that and give more headroom to boost. If you've already got a really good cooler/case where the CPU isn't getting to those temps then you might not see as big of a gain.wow on second thoughts think i might not bother for 1-2 % gains
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D Review - Best of Both Worlds
The Ryzen 9 7950X3D is the spearhead of the AMD Zen 4 X3D lineup. In our performance review we test AMD's new 16-core flagship with dozens of applications and 14 games at up to 4K, to see whether AMD can take the performance crown from Intel, how power consumption is affected, and what can be...www.techpowerup.com
6400 ram speed might be a little abitious tbh ( unless its with really loose timings ) - Have you tested that for stability ?
