Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ah, 6600Mhz + 2200Mhz FCLK the holy grail, very nice.7800x3d in an Asus B650e-i
Relaxed timings a bit for tCL, tRCDRD and tRFC
vdd/vddq/vddio 1.25v
6600c34
120mm fan over ram.
Nice low voltages, 27’c is pretty good for a max temp.7800x3d in an Asus B650e-i
Relaxed timings a bit for tCL, tRCDRD and tRFC
vdd/vddq/vddio 1.25v
6600c34
120mm fan over ram.
AMD drivers amiright?Don't install the new AMD Chipset drivers if you are using a 7900X3D/7950X3D as they appear to stop core parking from working when launching a game. Use version 5.08.02.027 until this gets fixed in a future update.
Back I goDon't install the new AMD Chipset drivers if you are using a 7900X3D/7950X3D as they appear to stop core parking from working when launching a game. Use version 5.08.02.027 until this gets fixed in a future update.
It's great the 7800X3D's are now under £300 pretty much permanently some place or another
Don't install the new AMD Chipset drivers if you are using a 7900X3D/7950X3D as they appear to stop core parking from working when launching a game. Use version 5.08.02.027 until this gets fixed in a future update.
A potential 9950X3D with 3D cache on both CCX's would be amazing, negating the need for any software driver to assign game threads to the correct core etc
Research and development means that companies can overcome prior limitations - it's likely a 9950X3D, with 3D cache on each CCX, would have mitigated the issue you describe.They did that ages ago and said it wasn't worth it (for gaming). The part which slows games down is when a game tries to talk between two CCX's as that's slower than a CCX talking to itself.
Great if people are purely gaming but most people are not and there is a vast gulf in some cases and generally 1-3 generations back performance in desktop use for non-gaming stuff, while the uplift in gaming performance is largely tiny aside from 1080p or below.
Research and development means that companies can overcome prior limitations - it's likely a 9950X3D, with 3D cache on each CCX, would have mitigated the issue you describe.
We'll see - though AMD's wording that they've significantly improved X3D is hinting at such progress IMO.
Alverson and Mehra didn’t disclose AMD’s exact reasons for not shipping out 12-core and 16-core Ryzen 5000X3D CPUs, however, they did highlight the disadvantages of 3D-VCache on Ryzen CPUs with two CCD, since there is a large latency penalty that occurs when two CCDs talk to each other through the Infinity Fabric, nullifying any potential benefits the 3D-VCache might have when an application is utilizing both CCDs.
You say "desktop use" but really "productivity" is the key word here, that is the real difference, the great majority of people will game, browse the web, and use basic office apps, in my whole entire life I've never met anyone that has used a PC beyond that, so on that basis with the 7800X3D you have considerably lower power usage (equating to lower noise output), much cheaper chip (£320 vs £520), also the LGA1700 has no future, while AMD have recently announced extended AM5 support until 2027+, so unless you're doing something like rendering or decoding etc I can't see an argument for the intel chip, and I say that as a person that has been Intel fan since the AMD Duron days.
Things can change, technology moves on. What wasn't possible yesterday may be possible in a year's time......AMD has tried it since the 5950X3D with all the cache ages ago. It butchers the gaming benefits of 3D cache to talk between two CCX.
AMD Shows Off Original Ryzen 9 5950X3D V-Cache Prototype
16 cores with two V-Cache chiplets were tested, but not realistic for the mainstream marketwww.tomshardware.com