• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: Ryzen 7950X3D, 7900X3D, 7800X3D

Will you be purchasing the 7800X3D on the 6th?


  • Total voters
    191
  • Poll closed .
Because of how well the previous 3D performed people have very high expectations. The whole way it’s been dealt with from reveal to release and also the price being lower than expected could well mean they aren’t the second coming of Christ that a lot of people are expecting.

This frankly.... but it also didn't help the fact that in some games the 5800X3D was monstrously fast and in other games very "meh" you also needed the very best GPU, at the time the 3090Ti to see its full potential, even that wasn't enough.... and some people didn't do that, TPU used a 3080, the base one.

A lot of arguments ensued about how good it was or not. Its pretty good, it was faster over all than the 12900KS at the time but it didn't blow it in to the weeds, i'm not expecting more than that this time round.
 
Last edited:
Anyway... according to AMD the way games are constructed these days favour the large cache pool.

Assets streaming, which is what they are talking about is becoming far more common these days, its one of the ways Star Citizen use to do away with level loading, only they do it on a colossal scale, in 2019 i think it was Sony who used Ratchet and Clank to flex similar technology they were using, Star Citizen had been doing at a million times the scale since 2016... and PC exclusive :D
 
Last edited:
I also think AMD could have given them the same cache between the 5800X3D and the 7950X3D. I think the increased cache size is to ensure the more expensive part performs better in cache sensitive titles.
 
One more think about large cache pools.

Its not as simple as just make cache bigger, you could, actually probably would lose performance doing that, its ironically about latency.

If you have a small cache pool data only needs to be read and written from...

Here<----to---->Here

A large cache pool looks like this

Here<--------------------------to--------------------------->Here

3D Stacking it looks like this

------to------>Here

<Here--------------

Its why HBM memory (Again an AMD creation) is so fast

So it only works because its 3D stacked.
 
Last edited:
Anyway... according to AMD the way games are constructed these days favour the large cache pool.

Assets streaming, which is what they are talking about is becoming far more common these days, its one of the ways Star Citizen use to do away with level loading, only they do it on a colossal scale, in 2019 i think it was Sony who used Ratchet and Clank to flex similar technology they were using, Star Citizen had been doing at a million times the scale since 2016... and PC exclusive :D
I was hoping it would perform better than my 13900k in Star Citizen what with the e core situation. I’m not too confident the 7950x3d will be much different because it may have similar or worse issues with the way it’s designed.
 
The annoying thing is that if devs actually optimised their games better, we wouldn't be in a position where this would all matter so much but I totally get why they are complacent and rush stuff out. I am personally going to wait until the 7800 one is out to compare and see if it will benefit me but I get why a lot of you are keen to just get one asap.
I don't measure perf too much outside of looking at GPU stats so I'm not even sure which games my 7700X struggles with tbh aside from WOW which I play now and then (can dip in to 40s).
 
Last edited:
Star Citizen, for reasons i explained, is a prime candidate.

dZPpr0o.png
You don’t think the 7950x3d might have similar issues the 13900k has though in that game, considering the e core, p core design.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The annoying thing is that if devs actually optimised their games better, we wouldn't be in a position where this would all matter so much but I totally get why they are complacent and rush stuff out. I am personally going to wait until the 7800 one is out to compare and see if it will benefit me but I get why a lot of you are keen to just get one asap.
I don't measure perf too much outside of looking at GPU stats so I'm not even sure which games my 7700X struggles with tbh aside from WOW which I play now and then (can dip in to 40s).

Ironically its things like DLSS and FSR that make game developers lazy, or perhaps the word you used is more appropriate, rushed.... why bother fine tuning your game to perform better or more importantly consistently, which can be a huge amount of work, when you can just add DLSS or FSR to it?

You don’t think the 7950x3d might have similar issues the 13900k has though in that game, considering the e core, p core design.

Thinking more about its an interesting question, the nature of 3D stacking, no, absolutely not, the game just sees a cache pool like any other and uses it, if the hardware works well then there is no problem, the 5800X3D has proven to work well so i don't see why the 7800X3D would be any different.

Ok, its no different with CPU's cores, the game just uses a bunch of cores and uses them, in your case most of those cores are very much slower than others, P cores vs E cores, the game will use the E cores thinking "well its a core, i'll use it" it doesn't know its not supposed to, Intel have to come in, and this is what they do... add an extension to the software to tell it "do not use these cores marked X" if not then the game moving around between fast and slow cores results in a huge variation of performance and with that your frame times are all over the place and it feels like riding bareback down a cheese grater.

With Zen 1 Threadripper this used to be a problem, because games would use cores in other CCD's, that causes the same sort of latency problem.

With Zen 3, both Threadripper and retail AMD added hardware logic to override any attempt to move the work between CCD's, it why this problem doesn't exist with Zen 3 and 4 multi CCD CPU's
With Zen 4X3D you have the added thing that the 3D Cache only resides on one CCD, AMD have just released a BIOS with more CCD prioritization logic.

So it should be fine, but don't hold me too it.... :)
 
Last edited:
AMD list the spec on its site, I have not looked in a bit but think it says 4 * 32GB will run at 3600 so anything above that is overclocking which is not guaranteed. If you need 128GB of 6000+ RAM, don’t know if any platform supports that?

Intel doesnt either. Thats the point that ddr5 is still not mature yet but i worry that we may well be stuck at 3600 on AMD (at least for this gen of cpu)
 
Intel doesnt either. Thats the point that ddr5 is still not mature yet but i worry that we may well be stuck at 3600 on AMD (at least for this gen of cpu)
If I had to bet, I would say 4*32 at 4800 will be stable for most withing 6 months. I want 2 * 32GB at 5600 or above as I have been hitting 32GB usage when working but even thats not 100% and the prices are high. Will have to wait and see if things get better.
 
There would be zero point in launching it if so. The productivity performance will be worse than the 7950x so if the gaming performance is also worse (or even only handful of percent better) nobody would bother buying it.
It's (7950X3d) still a better gaming CPU than a 7950x, so if you want more gaming performance but still a 16-core beast for other tasks then it makes sense. Plus don't underestimate people's desire for the top end sku, there's "bragging rights" value to it as well (no matter how we might judge them for it).
 
It's (7950X3d) still a better gaming CPU than a 7950x, so if you want more gaming performance but still a 16-core beast for other tasks then it makes sense. Plus don't underestimate people's desire for the top end sku, there's "bragging rights" value to it as well (no matter how we might judge them for it).
Ok. I guess that makes sense although it’s ludicrous to do so in my opinion.
 
X3D CPUs are less reliant on fast memory but I wish we had faster options too.
The really fast Intel memory isn’t even guaranteed unless you have a top end Apex, I’m talking 8000mhz and up. Considering AMD’s sweet spot is around 6000mhz and the very limit at this point that will work with Intel cheaper boards is around 7200mhz, it’s not really a game changer.

And like you say, the 3d CPU isn’t going to be as much of an issue anyway.
 
there are some new results on geekbench:

System Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X670E AORUS MASTER AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 22nd, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2271
Multi-Core Score 24727

System Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X670E AORUS MASTER AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 21st, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2186
Multi-Core Score 21859

System ASRock X670E Taichi AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 17th, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2154
Multi-Core Score 22668

System ASUS System Product Name AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 17th, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2157
Multi-Core Score 21841
 
there are some new results on geekbench:

System Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X670E AORUS MASTER AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 22nd, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2271
Multi-Core Score 24727

System Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. X670E AORUS MASTER AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 21st, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2186
Multi-Core Score 21859

System ASRock X670E Taichi AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 17th, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2154
Multi-Core Score 22668

System ASUS System Product Name AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 4201 MHz (16 cores)
Uploaded February 17th, 2023
Platform Windows
Single-Core Score 2157
Multi-Core Score 21841
Wish there was some gaming benchmarks as I don’t think the new CPUs are meant to be good one this one.
 
Back
Top Bottom