Frequencies at between 5.5Ghz and 5.7Ghz.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Poll: Ryzen 7950X3D, 7900X3D, 7800X3D
- Thread starter kindai
- Start date
Frequencies at between 5.5Ghz and 5.7Ghz.
See this https://robertsspaceindustries.com/...dron-42-Monthly-Report-November-December-2022
Just as a heads up this might/should be fixed for 3.18.
Deleted member 258511
D
Deleted member 258511
Brilliant. Thanks for the heads up.
Another non-gaming benchmark leak https://wccftech.com/amd-ryzen-9-79...mory-benchmark-first-cpu-z-screenshot-leaked/
Only 4 more days till we get actual reviews so not long now before the floodgates open.
Only 4 more days till we get actual reviews so not long now before the floodgates open.
Associate
- Joined
- 22 Feb 2023
- Posts
- 16
- Location
- Europe
interessting. especially the high-efficiency-mode...
Quite interesting but I’m not sure whether it’s something specific to MSI motherboards. If it’s something to make it easier to lower timings then that would be quite welcome for the release.
Gigabyte has analog settings, split into two, low latency and high bandwidth. Drops trfc and raises trefi among other things. Anecdotally for me it drops these beyond stability limit at 6400 XMP voltage. Hopefully it is chip manufacturer related optimised defaults.
Think Asrock had a similar setting.
In this example it makes the "stock XMP" bandwidth and latency numbers look really bad.
worth sending people to HWU reent tuned timings video. 5-10% gaming performance improvement is something not really achievable these days by CPU overclocks
AMD Ryzen 7000 Series [Zen 4] RAM/Memory Scaling feat. Tuned Memory
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxedJoin us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxedActually Hardcore Over...
www.youtube.com
Last edited:
Just a pity that properly tuning RAM takes an enormous amount of time. I had time outside work to do this years ago, not anymore! XMP with some minor tertiary timing tweaks and I'm done.Gigabyte has analog settings, split into two, low latency and high bandwidth. Drops trfc and raises trefi among other things. Anecdotally for me it drops these beyond stability limit at 6400 XMP voltage. Hopefully it is chip manufacturer related optimised defaults.
Think Asrock had a similar setting.
In this example it makes the "stock XMP" bandwidth and latency numbers look really bad.
worth sending people to HWU reent tuned timings video. 5-10% gaming performance improvement is something not really achievable these days by CPU overclocks
AMD Ryzen 7000 Series [Zen 4] RAM/Memory Scaling feat. Tuned Memory
Support us on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/hardwareunboxedJoin us on Floatplane: https://www.floatplane.com/channel/HardwareUnboxedActually Hardcore Over...
Deleted member 258511
D
Deleted member 258511
The new performance mode on the 3d CPU’s will be great for doing just that.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D 3D V-Cache CPU Tested In AIDA64 Memory Benchmark, First CPU-z Screenshot Leaked
The first screenshot of AMD's Ryzen 9 7950X3D 3D V-Cache CPU and its AIDA64 Cache & Memory benchmark have been leaked.
Associate
- Joined
- 31 Jan 2012
- Posts
- 2,165
- Location
- Droitwich, UK
Bogus testing by AMD (f.ex. no RT; real numbers in something like Cyberpunk are <120 fps as shown by our very own @LtMatt with the non 3D chip, and that's at 240p not 1080p) but here it is nonetheless. To me this says 13900K(S) will remain king in terms of absolute performance & for mixed usage. What people don't get is that getting wins >200 fps is not as good as getting wins when we're talking more limited scenarios (which is where Intel gets those >20-30% wins atm). On the other hand the 13900K has its own quirks that disadvantage it. At the very least though this should clear the 120 fps threshold in even the most demanding open world games with RT. Wish someone would do proper CPU testing of WD:L with RT, reviewers still rely on the built-in scene which is very light on CPU unfortunately.
videocardz.com
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 6% faster in gaming than Core i9-13900K according to leaked AMD review guide - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D official performance leaks out HDTecnologia have leaked new data from confidential AMD Ryzen 7000X3D review guide. What one should know about review guides is that they tend to focus on games that are optimized for specific hardware. This is a reference for reviewers to...
videocardz.com
6% performance increase over the 13900k? Sounds about right but pretty decent overall and should get better with Zen 5 X3D down the road.
Bogus testing by AMD (f.ex. no RT; real numbers in something like Cyberpunk are <120 fps as shown by our very own @LtMatt with the non 3D chip, and that's at 240p not 1080p) but here it is nonetheless. To me this says 13900K(S) will remain king in terms of absolute performance & for mixed usage. What people don't get is that getting wins >200 fps is not as good as getting wins when we're talking more limited scenarios (which is where Intel gets those >20-30% wins atm). On the other hand the 13900K has its own quirks that disadvantage it. At the very least though this should clear the 120 fps threshold in even the most demanding open world games with RT. Wish someone would do proper CPU testing of WD:L with RT, reviewers still rely on the built-in scene which is very light on CPU unfortunately.
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 6% faster in gaming than Core i9-13900K according to leaked AMD review guide - VideoCardz.com
AMD Ryzen 9 7950X3D official performance leaks out HDTecnologia have leaked new data from confidential AMD Ryzen 7000X3D review guide. What one should know about review guides is that they tend to focus on games that are optimized for specific hardware. This is a reference for reviewers to...
Not surprised with the results really wanted to see at least 10-15% on average so disappointing, will be interesting to see how much power it's using and lows in gaming
Still wanna know what the boost clocks are for the cached ccd on 7950x3d, we know the 7800x3d are 5ghz
Last edited:
If there is no scheduler wierdness, then it will be good to see AMD make another "no compromises" CPU.
I was dissapointed when AMD left AM4 buyers to chose between gaming **or** productivity when I thought they had the ability to produce a CPU that excelled at **both**.
The 5950X was touted as the "no-compromises" CPU as it was arguably the best at everything at launch. When they launched the 5800X3D, they totally dropped the "no-compromises" marketing.
I was dissapointed when AMD left AM4 buyers to chose between gaming **or** productivity when I thought they had the ability to produce a CPU that excelled at **both**.
The 5950X was touted as the "no-compromises" CPU as it was arguably the best at everything at launch. When they launched the 5800X3D, they totally dropped the "no-compromises" marketing.
Last edited:
Permabanned
- Joined
- 28 Sep 2018
- Posts
- 0
Curious how they only managed 36k R23 from a stock 13900k. That's more interesting to me than their numbers.
Poor testing, manipulation? Who knows, don't really trust anything official and if these are the results they are showing then it deffo feels like they have overhyped the product. C'mon @humbug break this down for us
Last edited:
Why exactly?Poor testing, manipulation? Who knows, don't really trust anything official and if these are the results they are showing then it deffo feels like they have overhyped the product. C'mon @humbug break this down for us