Sasha Johnson shot in the head?!?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Surely they would say in the news if he was a "black" man or not as they always do mention this whenever someone is, certainly when they are trying to whip up a storm.
Personally, I think it's far more likely they mention it ONLY if the shooter was a white male.
 
No racism
Interesting, you say no, I thought yes - as neither are the original poster we've got a 50:50 shot.

My assumption is based on the overwhelming nature of his posting history. This usage of "boy" during the oppression of black American males after (also throughout) slavery is deemed racist.

Upon reading again, perhaps he was making another one of his crass "gangsta" references, if I'm mistaken, so be it.

I just wanted to clarify that my usage of the term (which he references) was not intended to be racist or offensive.


Edit: @Efour - I re-read your post too and I think I got the wrong end of the stick there also, my bad! I think my brain is broken today.
 
Last edited:
Coming from someone such as yourself, Dis, that means a lot.

49nqqdF.gif



:D

I'm just kidding :)
 
So the lives only matter in certain situations. When it suits the political agenda.


When we look at the number of black people killed/shot or stabbed this year by the police, 0, vs the number of black people killed/shot or stabbed by black people this year it should tell you where the real issue is.

The police have apprehended the suspect. Defunding them wouldn't have stopped this incident.

Funding them more to do more spot checks, be more visible etc may have stopped this incident.

Ttip ftl
 
Was watching the nailbomber documentary on netflix last night.

One of the former members was talking about how the BNP lot would come round whipping up a storm in pubs saying how the people there were under attack and in danger.

Then Swan off back to their million pound Islington pads while the violence happened after the pub let out.

It was how he said they never thought anyone would actually do anything how it was just talking...until people did start to do things. And it was only really 1 in this case a handful in other but the devastation was massive.


It just seems so similar to retohoric coming from the BLM groups. And has already had similar consequences, such as the 5 was it police officers shot by one man at one event?

The leaders speak and take no responsibility for the destruction caused while saying how could they have predicted someone would do something horrible, after telling them they're under threat, their children are under threat that their whole way of life is under threat.
 
It just seems so similar to retohoric coming from the BLM groups. And has already had similar consequences, such as the 5 was it police officers shot by one man at one event?

The leaders speak and take no responsibility for the destruction caused while saying how could they have predicted someone would do something horrible, after telling them they're under threat, their children are under threat that their whole way of life is under threat.

Sounds remarkably like a certain other group we all know and love...
 
I thought you guys were all for freedom of speech and the consequences had nothing to do with the person saying them? Or is that just about insighting insurrections?
 
I thought you guys were all for freedom of speech and the consequences had nothing to do with the person saying them? Or is that just about insighting insurrections?

Have a watch of the nailbomber.

It's insane the stuff they were saying on TV.

Tbf though we have come a long bloody way in a short time since then.

It's weird I've drunk in the Duncan and it's one of the safest environments I've ever been in, weird to think it was only 99 it was bombed
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom