Please explain how one person dominating the sport again is good for it - for the life of me it will only be a bad thing
If someone is good enough to, why shouldn't they, your telling me if you were racing in a formula and you were the best, you wouldn't dominate for the sake of the sport, the spectators etc because you would, you'd be sat back laughing and thinking to yourself "These other guys need to put a bit more effort in to their racing."
These guys know it is a spectator sport but when they are on the track, preparing for a race etc they are only concerned about getting the best result for themselves and their teams, if someone dominates then the others need to raise their game its as simple as that.
All the talk over the years of Schumacher doing this that and the other really gets to me because people who don't like him or have a negative opinion of him always see him as a threat, why, because he was the best and very possibly still could be if he returns, since Senna was killed there has been nobody good enough to threaten him.
Solution to his domination, it's simple, other drivers need to become better, teams need to work together more effectively, they need to bend the rules as far as they are able to without breaking them (for example Brawn with their double defuser), they need to exploit every loophole going thats what the sport is about, being on the edge of technology, man, machine and tactics, taking it to the limit.
Many sports have been dominated, always have, some are right now and it will always continue, and I don't think there will be another Schumacher along for a long long time, if at all which is a shame as I would LOVE to see an Englishman as much of a success as he is but with the current crop, they just don't have it.
Some might say domination ruins a sport, I disagree it sets a benchmark for others to aim for and achieve, week after week they try and watching this happen for me is the fun and excitement of the sport, seeing someone who is so good do so well.
Stu