do_ron_ron said:
I think saying 14 year olds could leave school again was a bit off.
I'm not rejecting it outright and
some of her points and arguments were valid and then largely ignored or passed over, but she must have seen the pitfalls in conjunction with 'common' perception and legacy of the party and the sensativities around education and employment anyway.
There is no reason why if it can't be accomplished with the grant just now, it shouldn't. Even the freeze while having some long term correction being required at some point it was a very progressive and popular move. Swinney costed it for four years, and will have to for another five even in the face of cuts passed down the line.
10 years of pause on local government growth in rates is fine by me, and I think it was fine by a lot of other people as well. It's better than Labour not spending it, and sending it back to Westminster anyway.
Kids down mines (some must have looked at it so emotively) and rising taxes isn't going to bite it, not here not right now.
do_ron_ron said:
A smarter campaign could have resulted in being the opposition.
I think it was too heavily stacked against them, the obliteration of the Lib Dems and Labour's lead melting away had a momentum effect and ultimately picked up votes from across the board and importantly the swing voters.
I fail to see what the Scottish conservatives could have done about it without addressing the key concerns they have reported internally about its perception.
Although I hear whispers that some in Scottish Labour are going to press for a federalist setup to the party, lose London HQ. This is at the same time as London HQ are pondering over airlifting a Westminster veteran in to help the meagre ranks - the most stupid move I've heard yet.
The conservatives and labour could be doing without this mess considering what the realisation of an SNP majority means..