Does that also mean it's unfair that english folk don't get to vote in the Scottish elections? As that's location based too...
NVM, I'm picking holes for no reason here.
Because they live in England, the same as if someone lived in France.
If that Englishman and Frenchman moved to Scotland they would qualify for Free prescriptions. Yet if the same Englishman and Frenchman moved to Scotland and sent their kids to University only the Frenchman would be eligible, yet both are EU citizens. Therein lies the discrimination.
That was a ninja edit, my previous comments still stand!
Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway are also entitled to free university in Scotland .
It's not just something to hack the English off, the fees for studying apply to any citizens in the UK who don't meet the domicile requirements - granted that will affect more English than any other nationality purely because they make up the greatest portion of the UK's population. Although I love the idea of Alex Salmond twirling his imaginary moustache chuckling to himself like a weird dumpy supervillain as he ponders how much he is winding up the English over tuition fees that's simply not what is happening here.
It is unfair to a certain extent but let's not just make this about Scotland and England.
I am not making about England and Scotland, neither have I said it is aimed purposely at the English just to hack them off.
I have already said it is not about nationality, but the eligibility based on the domicile of the individual, this is about application of EU rules fairly and not about the Scottish Govt and their rights to apply zero fees to their residents.
Every example used has been if an Englishman moves to Scotland which, intentionally or otherwise, looks like it is about just England and Scotland.
For what it is worth I do think it is unfair but then again I don't think Scottish universities could cope with the potential influx of students if it became a popular way to avoid tuition fees for people from the other Home Nations. I suppose that would mean rejecting an awful lot of students if it is ruled to be illegal.
If people in England don't want to pay tuition fees they should have voted for someone else! It's a bit strange to knowingly vote someone in that said they would charge tuition fees then expect that a country that voted to keep free education to provide it those that voted against it...
I think the Scottish Universities themselves want to force the Scottish Govt to set fees for everyone as they are complaining of a shortfall of over £200m and that was before the cuts of £60m announced by Holyrood.
Whatever happens, something is going to give eventually.
I think the problem here is that England isn't actually a country within the EEA.
It was only for the purposes of the example to keep it simple as the eligibility discriminates against non-Scottish UK residents rather than non-Scottish EU residents.
I think the Scottish Universities themselves want to force the Scottish Govt to set fees for everyone as they are complaining of a shortfall of over £200m and that was before the cuts of £60m announced by Holyrood.
Whatever happens, something is going to give eventually.
But there would be no debate or case to answer if the government in Westminster hadn't decided to cut fundin for higher education in England, it might appear unfair but the Scottish higher education system shouldn't be punished for this!
If you really want to appear silly why don't you resort to name calling on an internet forum?!
I haven't called you anything even remotely resembling an insult.
Fair enough, sorry, it's probably just that chip on my shoulder making me read something more into the comment than was intended.
I think you're right that the Scottish universities want to force fees on everyone, the thought of what they could do with an effective tripling of the fees is unlikely to be passed up easily. Whether it actually benefits the students much in terms of the resources or quality of teaching available is another matter entirely.