I'm sure they care about every one of them, but in begums case being vocal about it is probably what stops her coming back.
Last edited:
Shamima Begum: Runaway IS bride to find out if she can return to UK
- Thread starter Richard - London
- Start date
Press F to doubt.
Given your posting history, I doubt you were being sarcastic at all.
Seems like you are looking down the wrong rabbit hole.
Soldato
They also sell a myriad of other goods, unlike a fried chicken shop.
Caporegime
However they still profit hugely off of meat. Fried chicken shops all sell veggie options, chips, coleslaw, salads, corn.
Seriously, what’s the difference? I could understand if you were talking about a butchers, a shop that profits solely from meat, but you’re not.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
All hypocrites will come back with an excuse, my daughter has to go past the meat section to get to the vegan stuff
Last edited:
Soldato
All hypocrites will come back with an excuse, my daughter has to go past the meat section to get to the vegan stuff
lol, thats an argument for veganism, ignoring the fact that no vegans say this to being with..... most crops grown (soy and grains) are for the 80 billion land animals we kill every year.
I guess theyre similar, except the percentage of goods sold would be vastly in favour of fried chicken but the main difference is I need a supermarket, I don't need a fried chicken shop.
Oh and btw, before I get accused of derailiing a thread, im not the one posting stupid anti vegan memes.
Last edited:
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,157
Just a question for you: do you think making somebody stateless sets an extremely bad precedent? If you do something the government doesn't like, there is now precedent for it. Would you like it?
It's very simple..if she's broken the law she should face court in the UK*
Making someone stateless is a very dangerous precident.
*Plot twist: The government know that any court case would fail as it would be very easy to prove she was coerced/groomed, given that she was a minor at the time.
Making someone stateless is a very dangerous precident.
*Plot twist: The government know that any court case would fail as it would be very easy to prove she was coerced/groomed, given that she was a minor at the time.
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Jul 2015
- Posts
- 152
Nope, I wouldn't like. I guess see citizenship very differently to the current government. It's unpatriotic to remove citizenship from anyone who acquired it legitimately. If you can take it away on a whim, how can it be special? Treating it like a drivers licence (conditional under specific circumstances) cheapens and devalues the concept, imo.
I don't care if you're a terrorist, serial killer, pedo, etc, etc. that's not the point. Once you're one of us, by birth or otherwise, it's final, case closed.
Caporegime
No there's not. She had the option of another state. She created the stateless situation through her choices and activities as an adult.
I tend not to join barbarous cults so I'm probably at a fairly limited risk.
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Don't you think that the 400+ ISIS Fighters who came back are more guilty because they actually fought?
It's strange you think 'she broke the law', what law did she actually break in this country?
Read what I said again... Lol.
Final appeal failed.
Shamima Begum loses final UK court bid over citizenship
The 24-year-old will not be allowed to challenge the removal of her British citizenship at the Supreme Court.
www.bbc.co.uk
Caporegime
Shamima Begone for good.
Soldato
They’re going to the European human rights aren’t they?
Are there any more legal challenges she could get her layers to bring?
Can definitely see ECHR stating that it was unlawful, forcing the UK to re-implement her citizenship.
Soldato
From what I understand; UK courts must consider the ECHR judgement but doesn’t have to implement it. Can choose to ignore. That’s what my 30s of Googling says.