Caporegime
- Joined
- 20 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 75,931
- Location
- Wish i was in a Ramen Shop Counter
another quality thread turned into a sharpness at 100% debate, all the pics are plenty sharp enough for normal viewing/printing comparing 100% crops is just pointless nit picking.
lol, i would find in helpful if i was toying with the notion of buying one!
is mine really not that sharp ? (straight OOC)
![]()
It's subjective, even the ones not pin sharp can be with a little USM in post. Resized for web though it matters little.
another quality thread turned into a sharpness at 100% debate, all the pics are plenty sharp enough for normal viewing/printing comparing 100% crops is just pointless nit picking.
another quality thread turned into a sharpness at 100% debate, all the pics are plenty sharp enough for normal viewing/printing comparing 100% crops is just pointless nit picking.
If I remember rightly we were comparing normal viewing not cropsand no they are not all plenty sharp enough. For example I ended up sending my Tamron back because it was nowhere near the sharpness of my stock lens and yet it was £200 more expensive!
If I buy an expensive lens I expect quality sharpness and clarity, it is as simple as that
Pretty much exactly this. I've been lucky in that my Sigma lenses have not needed any micro adjust on my camera although the feature is there to be used so if I did that wouldn't have been an issueIn all fairness the Sigma is about £400 cheaper than the Canon equivalent and a grand cheaper than what you could spend on a Nikkor 35mm f/1.4.
Most of the sharpness issues come down to the fact you have to be very careful with focusing when wide open as it's very easy to miss the spot and I expect some micro adjustment is required with some bodies. You get good and bad copies like with all lenses too.
If I remember rightly we were comparing normal viewing not cropsand no they are not all plenty sharp enough. For example I ended up sending my Tamron back because it was nowhere near the sharpness of my stock lens and yet it was £200 more expensive!
If I buy an expensive lens I expect quality sharpness and clarity, it is as simple as that
And off it goes to Sigma HK for servicing!![]()
Turnaround is said to be 1-2 weeks and I have a clear calendar this month so this could have not fallen on a better month.
Fixation didn't give a quote as they said check with Sigma UK first (who quoted me £90~).
I've sent it to HK though under warranty, I expect it back within the next week or so. Need to chase up status!
F1.8 at 18mm won't give you really thin DOF anyway, just gives you more light but the lens doesn't have image stabilisation whereas your 17-55 will. I considered the same and I can't see the point.