Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Serviced but not very well serviced - plenty room for improvement as can be seen with the MacBook.That are already very well serviced with a raft of products at various price ranges.
And currently neither is a Snapdragon Elite laptopAn x86 laptop is never going to give you all day battery life for anything other than basic web browsing. It's also never going to not overheat and generate noise under heavier workloads.
Like I said, 1 to 2 years of development to see what they can make of these chips. x86 will never get there, at least not easily, whereas ARM implementations have already proven what's possible.And currently neither is a Snapdragon Elite laptop
Remind me what the point is then?
Like I said, 1 to 2 years of development to see what they can make of these chips. x86 will never get there, at least not easily, whereas ARM implementations have already proven what's possible.
Assuming the software ecosystems gets the necessary development, there will be a large audience for these products.
You'll have to read more than just the last message.X86 will never get where? And what has ARM proven?
Serviced but not very well serviced - plenty room for improvement as can be seen with the MacBook.
An x86 laptop is never going to give you all day battery life for anything other than basic web browsing. It's also never going to not overheat and generate noise under heavier workloads.
You'll have to read more than just the last message.
I'm more excited for Lunar Lake in a few months time -Like I said, 1 to 2 years of development to see what they can make of these chips. x86 will never get there
Intel said that with Lunar Lake, it aimed to "bust the myth that [x86] can't be as efficient" as ARM.
Trouble is every time i see one of these ARM efficiency claims they are comparing them to really very inefficient Intel chips, just one of many ways its contrived.I'm more excited for Lunar Lake in a few months time -
Lunar Lake - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
I can't imagine many will make the switch until the software is there.I have, and i have watched reviews, i see no reason to switch to ARM and lots of reasons to stick with X86.
I've lost track of their naming, but the latest core ultra whatever seems to have got something right. They've been promising improvements for a while now and Lunar Lake could be a real contender if the support is there.I'm more excited for Lunar Lake in a few months time -
Lunar Lake - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Trouble is every time i see one of these ARM efficiency claims they are comparing them to really very inefficient Intel chips, just one of many ways its contrived.
It'll be interesting to see what they make of it when Intel takes that away from them, i have no doubt Intel are sick of being the butt of comparisons.
I can't imagine many will make the switch until the software is there.
I've lost track of their naming, but the latest core ultra whatever seems to have got something right. They've been promising improvements for a while now and Lunar Lake could be a real contender if the support is there.
Apparently AMD are looking into it. Would benefit them in the server space as well although the likes of Amazon might prefer to stick with their in-house chip.How long before other ARM chips venders start making chips for laptops/desktop. Would be good to have competition driving performance up and price down. Also, not a fan of Qualcomm so would avoid anything from them.