Noticed something.
Pytes have this image to help with telling version of their battery apart:
and over on the DIY Solar forum, someone posted a more detailed version:
https://diysolarforum.com/threads/dlg-e-box-48100r-testing-and-tinkering.37556/post-716317
Anyway, the BMS on ours says:
Device address : 1
Manufacturer : PYTES
Device name : E-BOX-48100R-C
Board version : SQBMSV15
Main Soft version : SPBMS16SRP2203V1.5.17.C8
Soft version : V1.5
Boot version : V1.9
Comm version : V2.0
Release Date : 22-12-12
Yet our batteries look like this:
So that is the power gauge label, the RJ45 ports, etc. all look like a version B according to Pytes' chart.
However, the DIP switches are 6 like on the version C whereas version B should only have 4 DIP switches.
Which makes me extra reluctant to try and update to the latest version of the firmware.
I did once again email Pytes to see if they could answer the far simpler question of given my serial numbers, can they tell me which version of the battery we have?
But total silence from them. Have to say that I would never buy their batteries with that kind of support. But it does also highlight just how poor the HIES's agents advice of "the manufacturer not the installer is responsible" really was.
Anyway, back in February my installer sent their electrician to update the firmware (this was when "everybody's batteries stopped charging" as their electrician let slip), and I now wonder if they maybe did something wrong there?
Is it possible that since February, our batteries have been running some beta firmware or a firmware for the wrong version of the battery?
Pytes don't do changelogs for their firmware but the latest for C is V1.5.24.C8 while if we actually have version then it would be V1.3.23. Both from the
end of February whereas the installer's electrician updated mid February (to v.1.5.17.C8 which numerically seems many revisions ago).
Someone on the DIY solar forum replied to me with their voltages when the battery was empty:
- whole battery at 49.3V versus ours at 53.7V
- cells at 3.025V vs ours at 3.365V.
To me that shows our battery thinks it is empty far too early.
And of course these figures are from the Pytes BMS so the inverter should not have anything to do with this.
If the batteries and their BMS think they are empty far too early, then might this explain why my calculated capacity figures (all the recent ones are now with the overnight charging and the battery there always starts out at 10-11% as empties the previous day) vary so much?