Boeing don't make enginesIf it’s a boeing I’m not going..
Another incident in Canada of a engine failure on a Boeing aircraft aswell
Boeing don't make enginesIf it’s a boeing I’m not going..
Another incident in Canada of a engine failure on a Boeing aircraft aswell
Yep. Assuming the aircraft lands in the correct place. In this case that looks to not have happened.They are designed to spec already with safety considerations of overspeed/mishap. That's why there was only a few airports that could handle the concorde.
The engine on the most of the 737s (CFM56) is also used on half of the Airbus A320-family fleet too.If it’s a boeing I’m not going..
Another incident in Canada of a engine failure on a Boeing aircraft aswell
Yep, it's an easy modification I suspect in most cases. Looking at the antenna at Aberdeen Airport, whilst the concrete foundations appear to be 2 feet above ground, there's an earth/gravel bank been built up in front of it.Yep. Assuming the aircraft lands in the correct place. In this case that looks to not have happened.
This plane crashed into a grassy bank. It doesn't really matter what you crash into at that speed.Yep, it's an easy modification I suspect in most cases. Looking at the antenna at Aberdeen Airport, whilst the concrete foundations appear to be 2 feet above ground, there's an earth/gravel bank been built up in front of it.
It's about 20 feet high with no ramp upThis plane crashed into a grassy bank. It doesn't really matter what you crash into at that speed.
This is real life not a Mission Impossible filmIt's about 20 feet high with no ramp up
It's hardly mission impossible to dig proper foundations.This is real life not a Mission Impossible film
I'm just not entirely sure what problem that solves. The plane still blows up, just in the field over and it looks cooler. Maybe more people survive, maybe everyone dies, it's impossible to know. I don't think it'll be worth the time, downtime and money to change these these things when it's probably been assessed plenty of times at airports all over the world.It's hardly mission impossible to dig proper foundations.
Agreed. Jokester missed fight club I thinkI'm just not entirely sure what problem that solves. The plane still blows up, just in the field over and it looks cooler. Maybe more people survive, maybe everyone dies, it's impossible to know. I don't think it'll be worth the time, downtime and money to change these these things when it's probably been assessed plenty of times at airports all over the world.
Nothing to do with the immense speed, no flaps, hitting the runway half way down, half reverse thrusters and no landing gear?Yeah, gonna go out and say it but that wall is the problem! Holy cow. It just hits it and disintegrates - genuinely don't know how there are 2 survivors.
Nothing to do with the immense speed, no flaps, hitting the runway half way down, half reverse thrusters and no landing gear?
Ok but take all the things I've said out of the equation and they may have survived.Planes have come down in similar conditions and with enough of a run-off there have been survivors.
Pilot maintains a straight path down the runway so there's obviously some level of control. Take that wall out of the equation and the chances of survival are going up significantly.
it's just folling the path of momentum ? like when a car spins out of control but wants to keep going in a straight linePilot maintains a straight path down the runway so there's obviously some level of control.
Did I really just read this.Pilot maintains a straight path down the runway so there's obviously some level of control. Take that wall out of the equation and the chances of survival are going up significantly.
Just as ******* well they don't, lolBoeing don't make engines
Yeah, gonna go out and say it but that wall is the problem! Holy cow. It just hits it and disintegrates - genuinely don't know how there are 2 survivors.