- Joined
- 29 Feb 2012
- Posts
- 1,765
Haz 1.368 is quite high. People usually achieve this oc with about 1.289. Are you sure you needed to go that high?
Lovely oc btw if its stable.
Lovely oc btw if its stable.
Trolling surely. There's no way you're so thick as to think buying an extra sound card to plug into the motherboard can be more environmentally friendly than using the onboard sound.
Well. Probably not that thick.
edit: looked at some of your other threads- you're a troll or a ******. If I had to guess which, I'd vote for both. As such I recommend you step away from computers and join the Church.
Silicone lottery, you could get a good chip or a bad chip for overclocking.
Your system isn't meaningfully any greener than the average system on these forums.
You can get an IDE to SATA adapter but they can be a bit temperamental and don't always work.
Or you can get an add in card with an IDE connector.
I know you want to be "green" but for £15 you may just want to buy a SATA optical drive: Sony Optiarc AD-5280S 24x DVD±RW SATA ReWriter (Black) - OEM
Surely even a powerful laptop will be greener than the machine he is building.
There are many with low voltage htpcs that are far greener than your decidedly average 'green' system
are you actually going to build this or is it just a pipedream?
Overclocking at all is not green relatively speaking, i think building a PC with the specs you're quoting is defeating the object of saving energy.
Stop trying to make out that you're "greener" than everyone else who's using the same kit as you.
Wheres the materials coming from? China?
You can keep regurgitating the same nonsense but the fundamental problem with your machine is that it isn't really, when you break it down, any greener than mine if I removed the overclock off the graphics card.
A fallacy going on here.
Download GPU-Z and run the program.
Click on the question mark at the end of where it shows the Bus Interface.
Follow the instructions.
Not CPU-Z, GPU-Z.