Soldato
a green pig you say?
A splodge of green paint to distinguish from Jurassic Pork (orange), Mark HAMmill (Blue) etc.
a green pig you say?
How much says i can go a lifetime and resist? From 1960 to 2010 there is a huge amount of movies and only so much free time. Infact it is easy for you to say prequel was trash but did you see prequel in 4k HDR? No one has! And it will wipe the floor with the modern films in 4k HDR. And i can only watch so many films why from the dates above you can fill a entire video shop.
You may have the perception everyone is ranting and then sneaking off to the movies, Maybe they do but i have already buried it alongside anything with even a remote smell of PC or SJW. As soon as i smell that dung like aroma whatever franchise that risked it pays the price. Now imagine if you all did this like me? Guess what would never of happened to popular movies? Answers on a postcard
A splodge of green paint to distinguish from Jurassic Pork (orange), Mark HAMmill (Blue) etc.
I would love to see the "sand gets everywhere" scene in 4k
Yea i said the guy was wood, But it is watchable and you know why i can watch it? Because the film was not cast with political quotas in mind. At least he somehow made it based on merit.
Ridley got her role because of feminism. Boyega got his role because they need a token black guy and to attract that black panther fanbase. And Tran got her role because there are a billion Chinese people who will be looking thier star wars fix. This is what globalism does to movies you have to divide up all the actors by race just to keep everyone buying the blurays.
It looks dumb, And it degrades the purpose of casting for the right role and once the painfully old original cast can no longer perform it will leave this sorry bunch as the future of star wars. And you will all see how B rate it will look.
Ridley got her role because of feminism.
Boyega got his role because they need a token black guy and to attract that black panther fanbase.
As far as we know, Lucasfilm and Disney have been developing two new trilogies of “Star Wars” films. One by “Game of Thrones” creators David Benioff and D.B. Weiss, the other by “Star Wars: The Last Jedi” writer-director Rian Johnson.
Now a new piece in THR indicates that with Netflix having locked down Benioff and Weiss for a five-year, $250 million development deal recently
Yea i said the guy was wood, But it is watchable and you know why i can watch it? Because the film was not cast with political quotas in mind. At least he somehow made it based on merit.
Ridley got her role because of feminism. Boyega got his role because they need a token black guy and to attract that black panther fanbase. And Tran got her role because there are a billion Chinese people who will be looking thier star wars fix. This is what globalism does to movies you have to divide up all the actors by race just to keep everyone buying the blurays.
It looks dumb, And it degrades the purpose of casting for the right role and once the painfully old original cast can no longer perform it will leave this sorry bunch as the future of star wars. And you will all see how B rate it will look.
Disney have managed to remove everything that made the originals great.
you could call it globalism ... or inclusion ?
would you prefer it to be like 'friends' 100% white cast and supporting actors ?
would you prefer it to be like 'friends' 100% white cast and supporting actors ?
It’s 2019 most of us don’t care about if a woman is the lead, after all many of grew up thinking Ripley was brilliant. The problem is when they set out create a “strong, independent, woman” which seems to be code for a perfect, poe faced cipher that lacks weakness, failings or personality.
I’m not put off by a diverse range of races in films. Although they do tend to wooden stereotypes. The problem is shallow pointless characters, especially when they have no growth other than to provide dull background to the dull primary. I mean what role has a Finn really served, I imagined during the first film we’d see some real development but that seems to have died flat.
IMHO it's a weird situation where in older films (from a less "progressive" time) Lando is a good character 'who happens to be black' or Ripley is a good character 'who happens to be a woman' or Frank N Furter is a good character 'who happens to a transvestite' etc yet modern "progressive" film making seems to reversing that to base the most defining aspect of the character around 'what' they are rather than 'who' they are and the characters themselves and the stories they're trying to tell suffer for it.