Star Wars VIII : The Last Jedi [WARNING: SPOILERS]

Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,150
I'm 11 minutes 30 seconds in and so far, hands down, its the worst movie I've seen so far... please make it stop.

EDIT: Finished it - I'm staggered at how bad it is - I had no idea it was possible to plumb so many new levels of dumb and stupid in one movie.

Its been rated so poorly on Amazon video its actually tripped their abnormal rating detection routine - it is that bad.
 
Last edited:
Permabanned
Joined
8 Nov 2003
Posts
6,743
Location
Yorkshire
I'm 11 minutes 30 seconds in and so far, hands down, its the worst movie I've seen so far... please make it stop.

EDIT: Finished it - I'm staggered at how bad it is - I had no idea it was possible to plumb so many new levels of dumb and stupid in one movie.

Its been rated so poorly on Amazon video its actually tripped their abnormal rating detection routine - it is that bad.

Didn't you like it?
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,150
Hmmmmm, crap SW movie with a great villain and fight or a better SW film with a petulant child and incompetent fool as a villain with an ok fight. Tough choice!!! :D

Atleast Phantom Menace didn't have Cod in frocks prancing about in the background or any number of other utterly dumb things. Even if it did have Jar Jar... at least Binks was just incredibly irritating rather than plainly dumb and stupid.
 
Associate
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Posts
1,893
Location
Hants, UK
Atleast Phantom Menace didn't have Cod in frocks prancing about in the background or any number of other utterly dumb things. Even if it did have Jar Jar... at least Binks was just incredibly irritating rather than plainly dumb and stupid.
But TPM had multitudes of things that made zero sense in the first 10 minutes....
 
Man of Honour
Joined
13 Oct 2006
Posts
91,150
But TPM had multitudes of things that made zero sense in the first 10 minutes....

It had some redeeming features, if you removed Jar Jar - the only redeeming features of TLJ were when it ended and being summed up by Snoke early on “My disappointment in your performance cannot be overstated.” (pretty sure it was actually commentary on the movie).
 
Associate
Joined
3 Mar 2010
Posts
1,893
Location
Hants, UK
It had some redeeming features, if you removed Jar Jar - the only redeeming features of TLJ were when it ended and being summed up by Snoke early on “My disappointment in your performance cannot be overstated.” (pretty sure it was actually commentary on the movie).
But you can't remove Jar Jar as he featured so heavily in the film. The 'prancing cod' had a total screen time of what, less than a minute? TPM disregarded/contradicted tons of stuff that was set as canon from the original trliogy, despite being written and directed by Lucas.
 
Permabanned
Joined
25 Jan 2013
Posts
4,277
The mere idea that it's worse then the prequels is ludicrous to me. AotC isn't even a film, just a series of moving images that aspire to be something even vaguely interesting.

The hyperbole surrounding this movie is mind blowing.
 
Soldato
Joined
7 Dec 2012
Posts
17,507
Location
Gloucestershire
The mere idea that it's worse then the prequels is ludicrous to me. AotC isn't even a film, just a series of moving images that aspire to be something even vaguely interesting.

The hyperbole surrounding this movie is mind blowing.
I've been unable to sit through AotC. Just lose interest before the end.

TLJ wasn't brilliant, but it was alright. Not as good as TFA (which I reckon was approximately the equal of RotJ), but better than episodes I and II by quite a margin.
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2005
Posts
2,653
Location
On a hill
I'm not a fan of the prequels but at least they had a story and a point. Their delivery was awful but you can watch each of them and see a grand tale being told and, aside from midichlorians, they did respect the force and the original trilogy they were building up to. They also expanded the galaxy is so many ways that served the extended universe really well. The Sith and the Rule of two, Darth Plagueis tale, Maul, QuiGon, Windu, Coruscant etc.

To anyone that's remotely interested, read the official Revenge of the Sith novel by Matthew Stover, its brilliant and shows just how much potential George Lucas's vision had. Then go and read The Last Jedi novel and all you find is a writer trying to make excuses for an originally badly written script. It's embarrassing.

Unlike the prequels this new trilogy has been made up on the fly with no goal. They brought in a director to do the middle movie who is so far up his own *** he cant tell what stinks anymore. The man masquerades on social media and Lucasfilm in-house interviews as saying he's saving Star Wars as if it were some lowly franchise with a failing fanbase. Honestly just have a look at what the man's been doing and saying since TLJ came out, he's a completely deluded whack job and a yes man to Kathleen Kennedy who is more interested in the American feminist justice movement. These people are literally coming on screen, waging their finger at our enjoyment of the original Star Wars movies and saying "We know better than you, you're wrong for liking that."
 
Soldato
Joined
12 Jul 2007
Posts
7,913
Location
Stoke/Norfolk
I got the same feeling in TLJ after getting to the Casino planet as I did during PM when the Gungans where introduced - that faint back of the head creeping suspicion that "I actually don't think is very good, but it's Star Wars, how can that be?"
 
Caporegime
Joined
30 Jul 2013
Posts
28,905
aside from midichlorians, they did respect the force and the original trilogy they were building up to. They also expanded the galaxy is so many ways that served the extended universe really well. The Sith and the Rule of two, Darth Plagueis tale, Maul, QuiGon, Windu, Coruscant etc.

Aside from changing the force that is "all around us" in to some stupid cell count that people have to make them more in tune with it?

Who was Sifo-Dyas? I know more about Snoke than him, and he was a major plot point in Attack of the Clones...
 
Back
Top Bottom