Started WoW Again

Vita · 15 Jul 2008 at 09:49

I made a Warrior, Nelf Female. Yeah the racials suck, and I should have rolled a dwarf or gnome. But I've got a soft spot for Nelfs lol.

I'm lvl 11 at the moment and going to go Fury spec for levelling, but weapons? Should I spec sword/sheild all the way to 70, or a 2H Sword? Or even 2x 1H Swords at 20 with duel weild?

Thanks.

waso_dude · 15 Jul 2008 at 09:52

Dual weild for fastest leveling tbh.

Sheild for when join gets tough

utajoker · 15 Jul 2008 at 09:54

i think u would be best leveling as arms. as fury your offhand will miss a lot.

sword/board will take u forever to kill stuff.

JoDaMa · 15 Jul 2008 at 10:16

Well... i've given in again, i'm installing it now. Just realised my account is still only basic Wow without expansion

. So I can use the 10 day trial.

Teki187 · 15 Jul 2008 at 10:39

utajoker said:
They are overpowerd atm. i normaly just run away from them now.

Mage here in full S3, i dont play the crappy cloned 17/0/44 i like to play, so im currently fire/frost. When ever i see a resto Druid, Warlock or holy/disc priest, i just run the other way. I know im urinating in the wind, so i don't even bother.

The worst is warlock spec'd SL/SL, having like 20k health and a higher damage output then me is just a little bit overpowered.

waso_dude · 15 Jul 2008 at 11:00

Teki187 said:
The worst is warlock spec'd SL/SL, having like 20k health and a higher damage output then me is just a little bit overpowered.

Shame as a MS Warrior, they do down like a bag of ***** then. I love sqwishy locks/mages/priests in PVP. They just die sooo easily.

Margaret · 15 Jul 2008 at 15:25

waso_dude said:
Shame as a MS Warrior, they do down like a bag of ***** then. I love sqwishy locks/mages/priests in PVP. They just die sooo easily.

Mages own Warriors so hard, if the Mage is half decent that is.

Shadow Priests are also hard against Warriors, and don't get me started about SL/SL Locks.

Warriors are the weakest class in the game in PvP (without healers) and have been for ages, still enjoy mine but it's just frustrating how long Warriors have been left underpowered.

KittensCake · 15 Jul 2008 at 15:30

Hahahah warriors underpowered LMAO. 1v1 means nothing man. Warriors are one of the best classes in proper PvP (Arena..etc) easily.

Margaret · 15 Jul 2008 at 15:34

KittensCake said:
Hahahah warriors underpowered LMAO. 1v1 means nothing man. Warriors are one of the best classes in proper PvP (Arena..etc) easily.

Warriors are the weakest class in the game in PvP (without healers)

and yes 1v1 does mean something, the Warrior forums being full of whine is actually justified.

KittensCake · 15 Jul 2008 at 15:42

No it doesn't. Blizz have said they aren't balancing the game around 1v1, so it means nothing.

Margaret · 15 Jul 2008 at 15:44

KittensCake said:
No it doesn't. Blizz have said they aren't balancing the game around 1v1, so it means nothing.

So? It still means something, I don't care if Blizzard aren't going to change it.

Warrior with Healer = Domination. Warrior without = Free HK. (again, unless severely outgeared or you suck, hard.)

KittensCake · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:00

Why does it mean something? It's not like your arena ratings are based on how well you do in 1v1, it's not like you obtain gear from doing duels, it's not like the ladder and tourneys are based around duels. It means nothing.

Margaret · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:04

KittensCake said:
Why does it mean something? It's not like your arena ratings are based on how well you do in 1v1, it's not like you obtain gear from doing duels, it's not like the ladder and tourneys are based around duels. It means nothing.

So what? For fun?

It doesn't mean nothing.

Infact why don't Blizzard just **** every class up in 1v1, I'm sure nobody will care, as it means nothing, right?

utajoker · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:06

believe it or not i have a lot of 1v1 fights in the bgs. its not all about arena.

Margaret · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:07

utajoker said:
believe it or not i have a lot of 1v1 fights in the bgs. its not all about arena.

Exactly, a LOT of my fights in BG's are 1 on 1, sure you get interupted and zerged during it at times but still.

Squink · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:08

Jihad said:
Infact why don't Blizzard just **** every class up in 1v1

As far as I'm aware they don't make any more than a cursory effort to balance classes 1v1. They state that in order to do this, they would have to homogenise all classes i.e. they would all need to have very similar abilities in order to allow for true balancing.

I personally don't buy into it but there again I gave up on PvP in WoW a long time ago after experiencing the utter tedium of being 100-0 in fear many times, being graveyard camped in BGs, coming up against flavour of the month classes etc etc.

Crimefighter · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:45

You do tend to get zerged a bit in BGs, but that happens to everybody.

Warriors complaining on the Warrior forums is nothing new, only Paladins whinge more imo.

Moley · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:50

Crimefighter said:
Warriors complaining on the Warrior forums is nothing new, only Paladins whinge more imo.

You should come into the Rogue forums then - full of clothies whinging that Rogues are overpowered....

KittensCake · 15 Jul 2008 at 16:52

Every class forum is full of whiners claiming their class is underpowered. They're usually tards with crap gear that have no idea how to play.

Tom2k8 · 16 Jul 2008 at 01:52

The patch should treat all the new players nice tomorrow. Mounts are level 30 is going to be a nice help, especially with my alts.