SteamVR Performance Test

well the difference between a i5 980ti and an i7 98ti is 2 whole points from here could be drivers chipset who knows i'll keep on digging but it's definitely throwing some odd results for me.

infact looking at rilots score there is something seriously wrong with my results :D

hmmm
 
Last edited:
i would have disagreed till i saw your score,

Can't explain how both a fury and a 980ti on a 6600k @ 4.5 aren't getting over 10 though.

but do on a 6700k
 
Last edited:
Princey said:
It doesn't seem that great of a test tbh, does it even render at the correct resolution of the Vive and Occulus?
Click to expand...

I think the internal resolution is rendered correctly, it's just run in a window. Some monitors wouldnt cope with the actual full-screen res, would they?

It obviously must be come sort of reflection of true VR performance otherwise they wouldnt have done it!
 
Princey said:
It doesn't seem that great of a test tbh, does it even render at the correct resolution of the Vive and Occulus?
Click to expand...

It looks like it's rendering much lower than the resolution of with the Vive or the Rift. It's pretty much a postage stamp on my 4k screen.

At least it's better than the Rift test which just looks at your hardware specs and says 'yes' or 'no'. The Rift test says 'no' for me due to my old 2500k which it doesn't detect as overclocked and so doesn't meet the minimum.
 
well thats my score on a 3770K @4.4 and a 290x @stock. need to get my second card back in and finish the watercooling i think.
25318759031_b910333993_c.jpg


Also just to add i seem to have got more performance after installing the 16.2 hotfix drivers, just wondering is this test still running on DX11?? would DX12/vulcan give an improvement???
 
Last edited:
I'm guessing a GTX 670 will perform pretty poorly for this? Not tried it yet. My CPU and ram should be good for it though.

Edit: Just seen above post! Looks like GTX 670 is not VR friendly.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom