Give it time, Sancho hasn’t gotten out of bed yet.Still no official mention of Sancho transfer!
We sold 7 first team players this summer (8 if Sancho is gone)
The summer before we sold 4.
The summer before that 3.
The summer before...1
And 1 the year before that too.
It's pretty clear we've done better at shifting deadwood than the previous regime. On top of that we've managed to work on more than one deal at a time AND have managed to sign more than 3 players in one window. It's early days and we'll have to see over the seasons to come how the new signings do but it's pretty clear the new regime is an improvement.
Yeah sterlings right up there isnt he
We got him for 100k a week and didnt pay a loan fee
Edus a mastermind
I'm assuming it's a PSR trick. As I understand it obligations with no conditions go into the year the loan starts while ones with conditions go into the next year. That is why PSG keep signing players with the condition they don't get relegated (Mbappe, Ekitike)Is that real? The utter disrespect for that to be a condition of a Chelsea transfer
Couple of strange last day moves in sterling and sancho. Sancho in particular for 25 million is ludicrous (less than Carvalho for example), i expect the 14th place addon is due to the expected big points deduction. Sterling is a weird one, he's an upgrade on some of their attackers but still doesn't really address the lack of a 'proper' striker - its right out of the guardiola playbook tho.
Even with the wages I would have though you could stick another 5-10 on that. I remember when folks were discussing him in pre season and non man utd fans thought you could get 35ish for him (as opposed to some of yours saying 50).Don't think 25 million for Sancho is ludicrous unless you mean he isn't worth that , he is on very high wages till 2026 , difficult getting rid and with questionable attitude
I think you'll regret getting rid of McTominay, scored some very important goals for you last season off the bench, can't see where you've replaced that.
Ramses and Xerses? Divine power?The untested Zirkzee, I guess.
I sort of agree though, United don't have many major goal threats, Rasmus (injury prone?) and Garnacho?
Even with the wages I would have though you could stick another 5-10 on that. I remember when folks were discussing him in pre season and non man utd fans thought you could get 35ish for him (as opposed to some of yours saying 50).
I think you'll regret getting rid of McTominay, scored some very important goals for you last season off the bench, can't see where you've replaced that.
Indeed.I recall Arsenal doing the same thing getting players out taking a loss , really no point keeping Sancho it's difficult to bargain when you have player with years on contract left on massive wages, McTominay would I have been happy to keep as backup on low wage never good enough to be starter but happy how ineos are going about business so far
Well this didnt age well. Doesnt seem like Ramsdale has made much difference in shipping goalsA big part of that negativity is the fact we'd be needing to score 3 goals every match just to offset how many goals we were shipping with our sub-standard line up of keepers, so if he performs, Ramsdale should make a massive difference to our ability to compete in the Premier League again.
Well this didnt age well. Doesnt seem like Ramsdale has made much difference in shipping goals
Pompey and Southampton seem to be competing today for who can let in more, not a good day for the Hampshire south coast today !On a positive note though, doesn't sound like any of them were Ramsdale himself making errors, unlike McCarthy passing directly to the opposition