Be fair, the conversation started transfer related.Can you lot start a thread if you want to talk about drugs, this is the transfer thread![]()
And this is based on? Just the other week Monaco were threatening to report City and Real regarding Mbappe. Even those cheeky ****ers Southampton were being threatened by some French side for tapping up some player. Peter Coates (Stoke's chairman), when commenting on a case involving a youth player, said that Stoke never complain when they're on the receiving end of tapping up at senior level because they know everyone is at it.I highly doubt it
Yeah m8 so the papers say, was anyone reported, no so it's just so much click bait, or utter rubbish red tops, It may happen, I'm sure it used to happen a lot more than it does, but these guys know a) if caught a huge penalty to pay, and a good chance you lose your job, it happens a lot less than what the papers say.
The reality is that at the time the tapping-up story broke, on the back of newspaper stories about Van Dijk being won over by Liverpool’s manager Jürgen Klopp, the majority of people working in the game will have wondered what all the fuss was about. “So what?” pretty much summed up the football world’s response to reports that Liverpool had been sounding out Van Dijk without Southampton’s permission.
“I think that’s absolutely true – what’s new?” Peter Coates, the Stoke City chairman, says. “And I’m not against people trying to do something about it. I’m just very cynical about it changing. I just think that’s how it is. And when it happens against us at senior level, I never complain because we know ‘everyone’s at it’ type of thing. You could almost say it’s part of the fabric [of the game].”
Plenty of agents, managers, players and boardroom executives would be nodding in agreement at Coates’s comments. What happened with Van Dijk has gone on for decades in one way or another and to such an extent that senior figures who have worked on the other side of the fence, trying to enforce regulation and deal with disputes, say it would be a conservative estimate to predict that 90% of transfers involve an element of tapping up. The number of complaints, however, is minimal, which tells a story.
U wot m8?Wow really m8 I'm starting to see why people always have a laugh at you on here, I never said tapping up does not take place what I was saying was in answer to the comment that baca and the player had already reached terms, ofc taping up take place but it's would always be through back channels and would not be directors of football meeting in some seedy hotel to hammer out a deal.
The times when it is blatant, they get caught pretty quick most times, i.e. Liverpool with VvD.
But then you amortise the cost over the length of the contract...
They've already bid, he hasn't gone.If barca go for coutinho he WILL go
No but it's been widely reported. Do you know personally that Coutinho will leave?You know personally that they spoke to Liverpool and lodged an official bid?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/fo...ain-as-he-pushes-for-move-to-Real-Madrid.htmlbale didn't and by accounts from liverpool fans, neither did suarez
See, this is what I meant when I commented on the inability of some people to read. Not justifying his price tag doesn't mean he was trash.People without the Utd blinkers on can only judge him on last seasons performances and tbh I like Pogba but he hasn't shown anything to prove he is worth his extravagant price tag you paid for him.
Why? Have I said Coutinho won't leave?This is going to be comedy gold if/when Coutinho leaves for Barca, I can see a lot of multi quotes coming with Baz's name all over them![]()
Kante isn't remotely the same kind of player as Pogba so pointless mentioning him as an alternative really (also he only wanted to move to one club which immediately lowers his value). If we signed Kante as a creative midfielder I don't think we would have done too well. Wijnaldum I haven't seen too much of really.
Pogba is a very complete player, if he can add a few more goals he can easily be the best central midfielder in the league. You spot people who think he's trash because they don't actually watch him play and just look at stats/read tweets..
DMs never go for anywhere near the amount that creative mids go for and Kante was at a small club moving to a big club. Wijnaldum was nowhere near as good as pogba last season and Pogba was constrained by his position and the players around him. Anyone who watched Pogba a lot last season will know he was very good. He wasn't 90m good but he was very good. There seems to be the myth that he was average to poor last year which is simply not true.
His position for most of last season meant that he wasn't able to score many. If you consider the number of times he was directly involved in a goal though he would have much better stats. He might play the ball out prior to the assisting players final contribution. Pogba was stuck in a bit of a no mans land. Not being able to go forward enough to contribute as much as he could but also not being a DM either. I think this season will be the litmus test.
Even if they did have the money, I'm not convinced they'd be happy to do that. Anyway, the theory doing the rounds is that the money for the buyout clause might not be coming from PSG but from some kind of commercial agreement between Neymar and Qatar. If true it would make things even more expensive because of the tax implications (do PSG/Qatar care?) but it completely bypasses FFP.One thing is that PSG wouldn't have to give him all the money to pay the clause now... they could give it to him over whatever period they want. They could give him enough now to afford the clause - Neymar and his father probably have a sizeable proportion of the 200m, if not all of it, so PSG wouldn't need to give them all of it.