Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,011
- Location
- Surrey
Yeah can't fault him for being loyal in the end. Wonder what we'll do now.
Yeah can't fault him for being loyal in the end. Wonder what we'll do now.
Oh come on, seriously? That is naive.Yeah can't fault him for being loyal in the end.
Reports tonight that Liverpool have had a £28m bid for Salah rejected with Roma wanting closer to £40m. Yes, the same Salah that Liverpool could have signed for £12m 3 years ago![]()
They wouldn't have a choice if someone sorted his clause...They're not going to let him go because of the transfer ban.
From memory that wasn't the case. He was set to join us, gave interviews saying as much but we simply didn't agree a fee with Basel and then Chelsea stepped in and signed him.
That's because supporters want everything. They will complain when a club charges too much for tickets but then expect the club to spend beyond it's means to sign a player and if they do pay whatever it takes to sign a player and he doesn't work out, they complain that the club overpaid too.Could be, and would highlight what I said earlier in the thread about us repeatedly missing out on players that we want in transfer windows because we have a history of not acting fast enough or trying to haggle too much over price being a cause of my pessimism when it comes to us and signings in transfer windows.
They wouldn't have a choice if someone sorted his clause...
According to Twitter we have agreed terms and salah agent is on way over to UK as we have also agreed to be fee off 40m euro for him. I always thought he was a good player.
But is ironic that if true could have got him for under 20m years ago
It's not true, just the standard rubbish from so called football journo's or the ITK's.Reports in France say Arsenal have made a 100m euro bid for Mbappe apparently. He'll have his pick of clubs I suppose and that sounds like a lot of our budget but if true then at least we are having a go.