Do you think "YouTube Grifters" is the only alternative source of information out there? I agree it's just as valid if people can't form an opinion for themselves but used mainstream media as a prime example as the censorship and twisting of articles/narrative put out is easy to see and to be honest for most people the buck stops there and can't be bothered to research anything more for themselves and believe whatever is told to them in the mainstream.Triggered? Lol why is pointing out a perfectly acceptable alternative version of what you said "being triggered"
Or don't you believe the amendment is just as valid?
I agree it's just as valid
Keep up, it's "legacy media" nowUnfortunately most people can't form an opinion for themselves so will blindly believe everything mainstream media will tell them.
He's straight is he?Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.
Best thing Tate could do to garner British media sympathy is put on a frock and claim he's now called Andrea, "coming out" on day time TV of course.
The best thing Tate could do is stop being a complete and utter ****
Real alphas would shag anythingAndrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man….
It is rather a strange oneMad how billions of straight men have managed to not get arrested for human trafficking. It’s almost as if being straight isn’t his problem.
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man
Real alphas would shag anything
I don’t imagine that’s the only ‘exit only door’ you’ve experience ofDammit, why'd I only find this out now? Next time I'm being arrested for entering an exit-only door at Sainsbury's I'll just tell Paul Blart I'm straight and that's the end of it!