Tate Brothers - Round 2

Triggered? Lol why is pointing out a perfectly acceptable alternative version of what you said "being triggered"

Or don't you believe the amendment is just as valid?
 
Triggered? Lol why is pointing out a perfectly acceptable alternative version of what you said "being triggered"

Or don't you believe the amendment is just as valid?
Do you think "YouTube Grifters" is the only alternative source of information out there? I agree it's just as valid if people can't form an opinion for themselves but used mainstream media as a prime example as the censorship and twisting of articles/narrative put out is easy to see and to be honest for most people the buck stops there and can't be bothered to research anything more for themselves and believe whatever is told to them in the mainstream.
 
Last edited:
I'm a little confused as to whether charges have actually been brought against them yet, at least in the way we understand being charged here.

Most news outlets are saying charges have been brought against them but they have not yet been committed to trial. The BBC say they are yet to be indicted. I assume this is just a slight difference in the way UK and Romanian law works? In other words being charged in Romania means you are formally under investigation and likely to be sent for trial, but there is still the possibility it may not go to trial (trial highly likely though), whereas here being charged means you're going to trial unless they are later dropped.

Is that right?
 
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.
 
Last edited:
high-elf-sigh.gif
 
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.
He's straight is he?

News to me.
 
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.

Jesus wept lol
 
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.


Best thing Tate could do to garner British media sympathy is put on a frock and claim he's now called Andrea, "coming out" on day time TV of course.
 
Andrew Tate's issue is that he's a straight man, if he was a homosexual grooming an underage gay lad the BBC would show up and ask him how he's feeling and everyone would say we should lay off him before he ends of up like Caroline Flack. Where as when the BBC show up and interview Tate who'd sat in a Romanian prison for 3 months without charge they acted like they were prosecutors in court and that he'd already been found guilty.

Yeah that is Tate's issue :cry: :cry:
 
Back
Top Bottom