Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Isn't the disclosure of sensitive information pertaining to the prosecutions file bad for their case? As in it would likely result in a miss trial if it every actually did go anywhere.
Tate Brothers - Round 2
- Thread starter Ice Tea
- Start date
Must admit, I’d be bemused to see the original, ‘totally harmless’ original English version of this:
Maybe he was originally talking about walking his dogs for long periods, for maximum health benefits?
Yeah I doubt it's massively mistranslated. But it just struck me as odd that it is the main headline story on their website, with a disclaimer that basically says "the BBC may have misinterpreted everything".Must admit, I’d be bemused to see the original, ‘totally harmless’ original English version of this:
Maybe he was originally talking about walking his dogs for long periods, for maximum health benefits?
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,159
I am shocked that such a **** would allegedly do things that a **** would do.
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,159
ROFL, is this all you have left?
What are you on about?
Permabanned
- Joined
- 25 Oct 2004
- Posts
- 9,078
Head line article on the BBC so clearly someone has an agenda, and showing their bias.
It would be like the BBC saying there's no evidence of aliens, but you know aliens.
It would be like the BBC saying there's no evidence of aliens, but you know aliens.
Last edited:
Suspended
Deffo a slow news day.
Funny I sniggered at this, thinking, oh yeah its going to be disturbing for some. They aren't going to like it and will resort to is that all they have etc.
Warning: This article contains language and details that some readers may find disturbing
Funny I sniggered at this, thinking, oh yeah its going to be disturbing for some. They aren't going to like it and will resort to is that all they have etc.
Warning: This article contains language and details that some readers may find disturbing
Last edited:
To be perfectly honest context is key. just popped "I'm going to slave these bitches" into google translate and it came back with "Voi sclava acestor cățele", then ran that through another translation website and it comes back with "I'll slave for these bitches". So yeah, the original would be required, as on one hand he's 'making these women his slaves', and on the other he's going to 'work really really hard for them'.
Last edited:
Soldato
Where have you been? Pretty sure that's been the case right from the beginning. Seems like a complex case and their system works differently. Honestly who cares how long it takes, he moved there exactly for this reason as he thought their justice system was crap.
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,159
It's cope from you. Clearly you think Tate is actually innocent.
You've lost the plot man.
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,159
Only because you can't dispute anything I say.
Do you think Tate hasn't committed a crime?
Dialup in the Letby thread: So what if she's been convicted, I need to see the all evidence before I can agree with the verdict!
Dialup in the Tate thread: So what if he's only been charged, I don't need to see all the evidence, he's guilty!
Never change dude
Dialup in the Tate thread: So what if he's only been charged, I don't need to see all the evidence, he's guilty!
Never change dude
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,159
Dialup in the Letby thread: So what if she's been convicted, I need to see the all evidence before I can agree with the verdict!
Dialup in the Tate thread: So what if he's only been charged, I don't need to see all the evidence, he's guilty!
Never change dude
But do you think he's likely to have committed a crime or not?
I am not saying he's guilty, I am saying I think he has committed a crime.
Just answer the point.
Do you agree that he comes across as a nasty individual?
- Joined
- 9 Apr 2012
- Posts
- 13,159
As for Letby, I have said like 10 times she's guilty and will rot in jail rightly. Frankly I think you're a troll at this point. Good day.