Terminator: Dark Fate

Just like Salvation and Genesys I will never ever watch this new film. T3 is one of the only films I have ever turned off in disgust. T2 is in my top 5 all time films, it ended the franchise for me and that is fine.


Could you be a bit more dramatic? It's just a movie ffs.
 
Sometimes feel like I'm the only one who really liked Salvation.

The terminator movie set in the future that inexplicably had barely any terminators in it?


It had potential

It also had a ****** director and a story that made no sense.

Didn't the terminator at the end throw John Connor around rather than just killing him instantly?

Yup, its sole purpose is to kill John Connor but instead of doing that lets chuck him around instead of pulling his head out of his ass.
 
Didn't say it was perfect :D


It could have been a good movie but they took the wrong approach to it, they set it early in the future war instead of the future war that's always been in flashbacks. Just looked like a random desert area with a couple of older terminators farting around not doing much.

The original ending that leaked was supposedly only part of what happened:

There was talk on the Internet about an alternate ending where Connor dies and they take Connor’s likeness and put it on top of Marcus Wright’s machine body. So that it’s actually a machine that’s leading the resistance! And the Internet caught wind of that and people went,’That’s bulls—! We don’t want that!'”

McG grins. “Well, that’s not really what the ending was.”

Actually, the bloggers were on the right track. Except, McG adds, the original ending actually went even further.

“Connor dies, okay? He’s dead,” McG continues. “And Marcus offers his physical body, so Connor’s exterior is put on top of his machine body.It looks like Connor, but it’s really Marcus underneath. And all of the characters we care about (Kyle Reese, Connor’s wife Kate, etc.) are brought into the room to see him and they think it’s Connor. And Connor Gets up and then there’s a small flicker of red in his eyes and he shoots Kate, he shoots Kyle, he shoots everybody in the room. Fade to black. End of movie. Skynet wins. F— you!”

McG says the studio had signed off on this original dark-as-night ending. But something about it didn’t smell right to him in the end.How could a movie with a reported budget of $200 million and a possible future of sequels possibly end that way?
 
There's a few things in both the casting and this trailer that leads me to think either the ending of T-2 is going to be changed via time travel, or we're going to see John Connor in a few sequences directly after the ending of T-2, and a few years down the line before he gets taken out by another T-800.

They have hired some kid to play John Connor at the age he was in T-2 and he looks very similar, so from that it looks like they're going to at least show some events directly after T-2. I reckon "Arniebot" is the one that takes John Connor out, he has battle damage so it would make some sense as in every other Terminator they seem to arrive in perfect condition (and not old). Legion succeeds\replaces Skynet and due to this it erases his programming or puts him in dormant mode as Skynet is out of the picture, he's reactivated and reprogrammed years later by Short haired Blondie. Sarah's reaction to Arniebot and telling him shes going to kill him sort of suggest this is the Terminator that finally took John Connor out.
 
Iirc, there wasn't much of anything in Salvation. Skynet is obviously really big on recycling.

Salvation looked to use about 3 set locations, had barely any robots, and yet still managed to cost $200 million. $150 million of that must have went up the primary casts noses.
 
Why would this Legion thing care about John Connor? Assuming the old Arniebot wasn't sent back in time by future Legion but by future Skynet (from a future that now doesn't happen) then present-day Legion knows nothing about John Connor or his role in fighting Skynet... so why would it want him killed?

This is the problem with time travel. It quickly makes no sense at all :p


Well the target is no longer John Connor as he's dead by this point via the skynet (assumed) arniebot, its this hispanic girl thats the new target.

Time travel never really makes much sense in these movies, hopefully they do a reasonable job of explaining whats going on.
 
I should probably watch the trailer :p Are we talking about the same old Arniebot from the incredibly awful Genisys movie?

Nope, this is a different one. I reckon its the one that finally kills John Connor and the events from that create this Legion thing which is an alternate timeline or something along those lines.
 
Might get some hate for this, but I really enjoyed the first 30-40 minutes of Genisys.

...The latter part was utter cack, granted.

The future war was interesting, as was "pops" vs the fully digital younger version of himself, though having the "i've been waiting for you" line and only turning up with a shotgun seemed a bit dumb, even if the plan was to have an ambush set up with a .50 cal.

One major problem is with the exception of Salvation, T3 and Genisys were essentially re-treads of T2. They need to get away from that entirely and have the future war be a main component of any future movie.
 
Yes right after it was shown literally ripping a T600 in half... yet when it has the ability to the do same to its prime target it just, erm, decides to have some fun?!

I watched the ending sequence of salvation last night, the T-800 throws connor around no less than 3 times, twice as arniebot and once as the endoskeleton. Cg was well done in that sequence i have to say.
 
Why is it none of the previous films captures that dark tone.

Terminator felt uneasy and dark yet gritty while feeling unsafe plus the whole mood of the film felt like creepy night life after midnight.

Terminator 2 had moments of summer during the safe breaks while the action took place late at night which had a metallic tone but you could still feel that sense of danger.

The first two never had over the top post processing. It felt quite naturally organic. T2 had quite a strong relation to being outside for real. Look at even the canal chase. It felt really realistic as if you were standing watching the events happen.


Terminator 3 started this cheese fest feel that currently exists like making stuff just for the sake of it with no passion. There were moments in it with that unsafe feel and realism to the world but the lame humour leaves a dent coming across too hard.

Salvation had that feel of the first Terminator. It was grungy, dusty, felt like you were in a disaster scene after events. It felt quite realistic in a dangerous unsafe new world from a nuclear event with no cheesy humour for the sake of it.

Genisys was somewhat ok but it felt like the cheese continuing from T3 while trying to capture the night battles of T2 but it also felt over processed in a way like it was too CGI/Digital. Too clean. In some ways it felt like something from X-Men 3.



With the first movie it was probably more due to the budget available. I know for Salvation they did something to the film that added more of a silver hue to it to make things look a bit different

"The film used Technicolor's Oz process during post-production. This is a partial silver retention on the interpositive, similar to bleach bypass, which will be used to lend to the sense of detachment from the modern world McG was looking for.["
 
A lot of the effects in T2 that people think were CG were also practical. Bullet hits on the t1000, the head split from the shotgun and the way it got blown up at the end before falling into the steel were all practical effects.
 
@Freakbro The effects he mentioned - the head split - gunshot blooms - final exploded/twisted form - all look fantastic as practical effects to me and I couldn't see CGI making those effects look "better" just "different".


More a matter of it being easier and quicker to do in cgi, no real point in having people try to design something then have to trouble shoot it etc and then end up with a bunch of limitations on what it can or can't do or what camera angles it works from, vs a cgi variation that can be easier and quicker to do as well as having less limitations.

People really have this weird rose tinted view of T-2 that the effects were so much better vs todays effects, when Genisys came out people were saying that the t-1000 visual effects didn't look as good as the original in T2, but if you compare them side by side the Genisys version looks much better as it's fluid moves better, its reflections work better etc. People seem to put the effects from T2 on some kind of imaginary pedestal and act like they can't be beaten for some reason or other.
 
Which is funny because all I remember hearing was CGI was to save money over models and puppets. As well as time.


For the most part it does, it's only when people are trying to replicate humans that it's a longer process as anything even slightly off about it ruins the illusion.

Theres a few shots of the young arniebot in genisys that you wouldn't know are cg, the whole scene was filmed with a body double but it had to be totally redone as a digital arnold.

Ita far easier and quicker to go through digital iterations of a character than having to build multiple practical models from the ground up then rig them with animatronics etc.
 
Another CGI problem is that the work takes so long to do that you need to book it in often before you've shot the rest of the movie - which means it's harder to make changes. This cropped up in another YT vid, talking about the Ghostbusters reboot IIRC, where the stuff happening in the big action scene near the end didn't really match up with the characters we'd been with for the rest of the movie.


Got a link to that vid? Cant say i noticed anything like that in the trainwreck reboot.
 
Back
Top Bottom