What criteria are we basing the top three players on ??
Fabregas has been turd for the best part of 18-24 months, FACT. So best in the world, nowhere near. Unless he discovers/rediscovers some exponentially world beating form in the next month or so, he doesn't deserve to be in the top three.
If your going off form then Suarez has had a handful of better games than Fabregas since January. Does he deserve to be in there as top three material ?
Top three for me (ad by a very good distance as well)
Xavi - The absolute master of ball retention from box to box, short passes and maintaining possession. He can build play up on the edge of Barca's box, be involved in 10-20 short passes right upto the edge of the opponents box and then play the killer ball for the goal.
Messi - Benefactor of Xavi/Iniesta's intelligent play. In his own right though can pick the ball up deep and beat 4 or 5 players before scoring or creating a goal. There is a world of difference between beating one defender and beating three - four on a very regular basis.
Ronaldo - Pace, Skill, Dribbling, Power, Free Kicks, If you cut off both legs he will score with his head. Evryone throwing the likes of Aguero, Silva, Suarez in, have a look at this lad and be honest if you think they are in the same league, nowhere near
Bahahaha
Iniesta in the best team in the world, got 12 goals 12 assists, starting 61 games for Barca and Spain, the second best team in the world maybe.
Xavi got 5 goals, 14 assists in 57 starts for the same two teams.
Fabregas made 33 starts last year, for Spain, and Arsenal who are no where near the best team in the world, he got 10 goals, and 16 assists. So a higher total than both the other players, in almost 45% less games.
Yeah, Fabregas has been shocking in the past 18 months, quite literally the ONLY reason Arsenal are in the champions league, whats the stat Arsenal without Cesc, 31% wins, with Cesc 64% win rate.... the true sign of a player in horrible horrible form.
Despite playing with a recurring injury, he outperformed pretty much every attacking central mid in the world last season playing almost half the games........ just woeful form.
He's also started, errm 2 of 2 La liga games so far, and score, 2 goals.
IIRC this season Xavi has 7 appearances 1 goal and no assists for Barca this season. Iniesta has 8 appearances, 1 goal, 1 assist so far, and Cesc has 4 appearances, 3 goals, 1 assist.
Cesc is and always has been better than those two, he's more versatile, able to play anything from a deeper Xavi type role, to center forward where he started today, either wing, basically any offensive or midfield defensive position.
Spain were clearly, provably, statistically better in both the world and euro cups with Cesc on the pitch rather than without, for Arsenal the same is true to even the most blind person alive.
Best three players on the planet, Ronaldo, Messi, Cesc, in whatever order you want. Rooney on current form..... form has nothing to do with quality, he's tapping them in nicely, all game long the forum was full of "Rooney can't pass for ****" posts, because, he can't pass for ****. He often goes missing in big games, as, errm, Messi went missing today for Barca, as Ronaldo has, as Cesc has, as.... Zidane, Beckham, fat Ronaldo, thin Ronaldo, Xavi, Gerrard, Lampard, Torres, Drogba, etc, etc, every player has bad games, big whoop.
Rooney's getting goals, that doesn't make him one of the best three footballers alive, if current form meant that much then THeo getting a hattrick last year meant he was one of the top three that week for 8 seconds, except, thats ridiculous. Rooney's very good, he's excellent for Utd, his all around game doesn't come close to Ronaldo/Messi/Cesc.
Xavi is an exceptional player, but both he and Iniesta are a little over rated, Xavi really became seen as the best in the world, rightly, in a season he got 34 assists in and 16 goals, it was a truly phenomenal season, I'm not sure Cesc will ever beat that because it is, epic. Its slightly misleading(and I mean slightly) because Xavi also played in a pretty shocking 77 games that year
His fitness is pretty insane aswell, he's averaged 63.2 games a year in the past 5 years after his one and only injury hit season where he still played 20+ games.
In reality none of the season before or since have come close to that, but that is a year that should live in footballing history.
Iniesta, its debateable which actually is his best every year, 12 goals 12 assists, or 9 goals 16 assists, both in around 64 games, good years but, for a far more attacking player who plays ahead of Xavi, its not in the same league as a 16 goal 34 assist season. Iniesta is also a great player, but he's not even close to Xavi's level.
If this were 3 years ago, Xavi would be there instead of Fabregas, almost any other season Fabregas ahead of Xavi, not by much, but ahead for sure.