1440p Extreme with RTX on >50 fps... is unplayable? I guess you can sign me right up (and whomever still makes up AMD's pitiful marketshare).
In the Tundra area which is the same as the one from the benchmark of the game, in the area of it where I'm now, if put on a similar number of pixels on screen with that guy (dif res, 3840x960, but shouldn't matter),
the fps goes under 30 on a rtx2080. Even with RTX on high and it's still really bad ~ 30fps +/-. I can't get 60 fps on that resolution until medium settings, high rtx, gpu physix on, no hair thingy, no tesselation and shading rate lower, so bye-bye sharpens. Thx, but no thx.
I've looked a few times at the benchmark of Shadow of the Tomb Raider and I think
maybe I've seen some difference in a place or two with RTX on vs off, but not much to care or want.
Frankly, if I would have not played with the RTX "holly grail" I would probably felt a little bad for not having it, but at this point it's more of a serious
meh. The difference
in most cases is subtle and performance terrible. In all games with a fix time of day or lighting setup, you can use baked stuff with similar if not same results, while maintaining a high performance.
PS: Heretic looks great without RTX, The Book of the Dead as well, just as a quick couple of examples of life without RTX. And for sure better than Quake RTX(ed)!