Discussion in 'Graphics Cards' started by subbytna, Aug 20, 2017.
At least Ryzen 3000 looks really good, if true of course.
I feel your pain, dude. I feel your pain.
If AMD can offer more like RTX2070 performance for RTX2060 pricing for the $399 model it would be something,but any less and people will buy the RTX2060,as Nvidia will have RTX as a feature they might or might not use. Also AMD has no excuse not to be able to beat the RTX2060,when the Turing RTX dies use a fair percentage of the chip for RT and tensor cores,which is not used in most games.
Yep I remember playing D3D on a 486sx 25mhz, picking between running it at 50% view window on a 14" monitor or disabling sound for it to be playable, also surely you must of had at least a 486DX 66mhz+ for quake 1 ? the SX chips could'nt play quake 1 as the maths co-processor was disabled.
Now i feel old
If Nvidia announces next week RTX with lower price and newer higher bandwidth card at same current price AMD is dreaming to ask premium price for those performances. Instead of competing they are doing them a favor...
I had DX2 when Quake1 came out then I had pentium pro 75mhz hehehe Pentium was running at almost 90mhz if i remember good the OC on that
@LePhuronn it sucks so bad i just staying away from Online shooters now. From having 2.5- 3:1 KDR Im like 1:2 now dont want to play online shooters anymore.
buyers will just go Nvidia anyway.
When me and my dad in stalled a Sound Blaster pro a whole 2x speed cdrom we changed the cpu to a DX-2 66 but the MB official didn't support the FSB at the time so ended up being Oc'ed to a staggering 83mhz.
30 FPS is a unplayable resolution and painful for the eyes and brain in any game. Any lower is just a slideshow, not gaming.
Nice try of rolling, though D:
Console gaming would like to have a word. They've been doing fine with 30fps for years. Not that it's good, 60fps should be minimum in this day and age for anything, but 30fps is far from unplayable.
As Zeed says, I remember playing the original Tomb Raider on PC using a K5 166 and a 2MB S3 Virge! at about 10-15fps and I put a lot of hours into that! Simpler times before we were all spoilt with a bajillion pixels and a squillion Hz and now it's much harder to go back.
No way I'd be playing anything at that fps now though
maybe for You I'm not ********* i can handle 50+ hours of gaming with no sleep brakes ect.
I'm old school we used to do speed and do 2-3 day quake3 arena sessions mixed with star craft every other weekend
I got eye drops next to my monitor no pain no play
NO LIGHTWEIGHT HERE MATE im 14 hours in Division 2 atm got those puppies to get me going.
Telling no life like me that i cant play at slideshow fps or the cinematic 30 ?? LOL
If those leaks are true that is pretty disappointing. Was expecting V64 performance (3070) to be sub $/£300 and the 2070 performance like card to be under $/£400.
This is just matching existing nvidia price/performance.
Nv can just knock $50 off their current 2060/2070 and those Navi cards are pointless.
AMD Hype Train in danger of being derailed....!
It always does. Looking like the Navi car will catch fire though...
If it's faster than my Radeon 7/2080 I'd go ape**** anyhow so am happy
Except that the Navi cards will have much more room for discounts as being manufactured on the superior process. The RTX cards won't get meaningful discount anyways because their GPUs are large and their yield is abysmal.
That is a big change.
And it's gone!
For the better or worse? I don't understand the numbers.
Separate names with a comma.