Unfortunately that's probably accurate when the 5070ti is $750
$649 sounds pretty decent after todays 5080 reviews though, getting 90% of the 5080's performance at $649 instead of $999 is great
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Unfortunately that's probably accurate when the 5070ti is $750
$649 sounds pretty decent after todays 5080 reviews though, getting 90% of the 5080's performance at $649 instead of $999 is great
Is it stable in all games? haven't tried with mine yetFor comparison My 7900 XT overlocks about 13% in actual games. My 4080 got at best 4%. So the 7900 XT goes from 15% slower to ~5% slower when overclocked. So those numbers seem about right.
Obviously this means nothing as far as RDNA4 goes though.
Still think £600 would shake things up more
Apart from the unknown about the pricing, my other concern is the 16GB on the 9070XT. Especially, since the 7900XT/X had more 2 and the 6800XT equal 4 years ago respectively. It could limit the useful life of the card, especially when a new console generation comes along.
Strikes me as a bit "Nvidia-ist" and built in obsolescence. So still tempted by a fire sale 7900XTX if one comes up.
Amd cards are selling well in the overclockers todays deals
8x 7900xtx
2x7900xt
4x7800xt
so tempted with a 7800 but know I will regret it in two months time
So would £50
If MLID is right, the 9070 and 9070 XT are about to make every other GPU between £400 and £999 pretty irrelevant. And even looking at the 5080, you would need to have money to burn to justify the extra £400 for a <10% increase in gaming performance.
Exactly. It will be near in performance to the 5070 Ti, not the 5080 like so many dream about, but likely still worse by a tier in RT and way more in PT not to mention all the other goodies it's missing that are Nvidia features. If they were to price it at $649 it would just be trash. Realistically they need to do $550 at most to really make a dent, unless they just don't plan to ship volume and want to drip feed them until UDNA.Unfortunately that's probably accurate when the 5070ti is $750 , AMD has closed the gap but that price still wouldn't be good enough
Yes, I think at 1440p it'll be fine for a few years - moving to 4K may be an issue though.I'm at 1440p so I think I'll be okay also has the raw GPU power to give nice headroom at that resolution
That makes sense - it still all then comes down to price, and if the improved FSR4 and RT is important to the user, i'm still on the fence about RT personally, but it seems to be built-in to more games and this trend will likely continue. FSR4 may prove more useful if widely adopted and is as good as the hype.I think the issue is the die size is quite a large monolithic die supposedly 390mm2 (rumors though), slightly larger than the 4080 and so to get the price point they need to skimp elsewhere, and really the only way for that to happen is to reduce the ram capacity.
From a gamer perspective there is clearly a sku missing, the one between the 5080 and 5090 that would essentially be a 4090 refresh which would tempt many into opening their wallet, flagship performance just a little late would be justifiable to many. It could exist at some point when badly binned GB202 stacks up enough, but I don't know if it will exist in numbers to satisfy gaming demand. The 5090 is already by quite a margin not the best bin of the GB202, in a sense the 5090 is where quite a lot of the chips go that underperform wherever the golden chips go for funny money. Nvidia is in an insanely comfortable position being able to offload a lower bin as their flagship consumer part like this.5080 Ti / Super would be easy - just take the full fat GB202 chip from the 5090 and disable some SMs
5070, similar approach, using the GB203 chip (which the Ti already uses).
Exactly. It will be near in performance to the 5070 Ti, not the 5080 like so many dream about, but likely still worse by a tier in RT and way more in PT not to mention all the other goodies it's missing that are Nvidia features. If they were to price it at $649 it would just be trash. Realistically they need to do $550 at most to really make a dent, unless they just don't plan to ship volume and want to drip feed them until UDNA.
650-699 for a 70 tier card.. so Nvidia now dictating AMD pricing.
Some of you guys are getting proper sucked into these higher prices just because performance 'might' be close to a 5080![]()
Exactly. It will be near in performance to the 5070 Ti, not the 5080 like so many dream about, but likely still worse by a tier in RT and way more in PT not to mention all the other goodies it's missing that are Nvidia features. If they were to price it at $649 it would just be trash. Realistically they need to do $550 at most to really make a dent, unless they just don't plan to ship volume and want to drip feed them until UDNA.
I think anything much above 650 puts it too close to the 5070ti, or at least it's msrp, if amd want a clear win. A better deal than a bad deal doesn't make it good.
I feel like they have an opportunity here to really gain some mind share. If they get the price right, I can see the thumbnails now, big grin holding up a 9070xt big red arrow pointed at it "buy this one"
I 100% agree, but this is AMD we're talking about, they work for shareholders not us. I will be buying something the newly revealed 5080 prices has ruled that out.
Likely looking at a 7900xtx that's been reduced or a 9070xt. I'd love it to be sub 600 I just don't see it happening.
AMD has to be a bit careful with pricing. Once the 3GB GDDR7 modules are easier to get,Nvidia could make a Super refresh by the end of the year once RTX4000 stock is finished. The last Super refresh might be one of the factors why AMD sales tanked last year.