What about %30 faster than 5070 12GB but with $549 fake MSRP as well
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***
- Thread starter humbug
- Start date
I assumed that quoting you in my reply was clear enough. Here's an explanation:
You wrote this:
You never heard of someone doing that. Now you have heard of someone doing that. More than one person. There are people who don't set a fixed budget and spend all of it, never spending less regardless of what's available at a price lower than their budget. There are people who set their budget as a maximum spend, not a required spend.
Associate
- Joined
- 28 Jul 2015
- Posts
- 310
You got that all wrong..
The 9070XT needs be 30% cheaper than the 5070Ti with better raster performance
I dont care about RT, DayZ has none
In all seriousness, that would work as well, $549 is 27% less than $749. So it could be "same price as 5070, but 40% faster" (for example).
Chinese leakers say the RX9070 series is going to be priced aggressively:
AMD Rumored To Price Radeon RX 9000 GPUs 'Aggressively' To Compete With NVIDIA
AMD might price the Radeon RX 9000 GPUs so aggressively that it may also affect the sales of their existing mid-range GPUs.wccftech.com
Still vague since they generalised the card name. The leak could in theory mean that the base 9070 could go up to £600!
With that said it's a leak and I get at least a little bit excited when I see some news. It's the most we've had for about 10 pages
Last edited:
If AMD want to really gain the marketshare they have to price extremely aggressively, even making a loss if they have to for long term gain. As their top chap said developers are not incentivised to optimise for a platform with 15% marketshare even if they could. (Case in point the WoW DX12 crashing bug on the 7000 series which has still not been fixed as far as I am aware).
My fear though is even if they do this, they might not be able to actually produce enough cards to meet demand. Fab capacity is a finite resourcce there's only so many silicon wafers to go around.
My fear though is even if they do this, they might not be able to actually produce enough cards to meet demand. Fab capacity is a finite resourcce there's only so many silicon wafers to go around.
They can price aggressively, but then it’s down to the retailers that have turned into scalpers that are ruining it. Only got to look at the 50 series prices.
Last edited:
AMD are not really missing any major features or performance this time around. The hardware and software will be excellent.
There isn't a single gaming feature that seems to be missing from the spec sheet, it won't run hot and it will be a very powerful card.
There isn't a single gaming feature that seems to be missing from the spec sheet, it won't run hot and it will be a very powerful card.
Soldato
- Joined
- 15 Oct 2003
- Posts
- 15,649
- Location
- Chengdu
Any more info on it, Mystic Meg?
I have no hopes for this card now. I’m sure it’ll be another good card, ruined by AMD’s management.
Just waiting for Intel to do something, because it’s difficult to support the other two.
Regardless of how AMD decides to price their new cards, improving raytracing and providing a solution that can compete with DLSS would be nice. Intel releasing something more powerful than the B6580 would also be interesting to see.