• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

Yes, of course the whole thing is a conspiracy. use your own time to dig through HUB's back catalogue to be part of said conspiracy.
Not really quoting the correct post - but my response was about the VRAM but I didn't want to flick back and find the correct one.

I didn't think it was so much NVidia reducing the LoD, but more the games themselves. I seem to recall Hogwarts, Forspoken and Halo all having detail issues with lower capacity VRAM cards (i.e. 8GB). I did have a quick search for the video because I seem to recall one too, but couldn't find it. I did stumble across this brief comparison of 8gb/16gb on the 4060ti

 
  • Like
Reactions: TNA
5070ti is basically 4080s performance. Leaks suggest the 9070xt is pushing 4080 performance. AMD if they are serious will price the xt max $599 vs $750 ti msrp.

Hardly any difference between 4080 and 4080 super
Also RT hardly improved so although AMD wont beat it but might really close up the gap

hx6uCZ9.jpeg
 
Last edited:
depends on your needs 84 Vs 91 FPS, are you gonna see that on the screen ?! 5080 was crippled to make room for the 5080 super.I can see AMDs point about a potential 9090XTX , I am not sure it would be fast enough to tempt people for an upgrade over the 7900XTX and the games just aren't there to justify it.
 
Last edited:
This whole "5080 was crippled intentionally" stuff is complete nonsense. The 5080 is made up of an entire 100% GB203 die. If they want to make a faster 5080 they will need to use the same die as the 5090 (GB202) which they won't want to do cause they will make far more money using the dies for basically anything else.
 
Ignoring these are £900/£1000 card the 7900XTX is a good buy if all you care about is rasterization it can give the 4090 a run for it's money but if I'm paying that much for a video card (I wouldn't) I'm expecting to run games at max settings with ray tracing at which point the performance of XTX falls of a cliff.
 
Ignoring these are £900/£1000 card the 7900XTX is a good buy if all you care about is rasterization it can give the 4090 a run for it's money but if I'm paying that much for a video card (I wouldn't) I'm expecting to run games at max settings with ray tracing at which point the performance of XTX falls of a cliff.

espeically RT is now required in some games, can't be disabled.
 
This whole "5080 was crippled intentionally" stuff is complete nonsense. The 5080 is made up of an entire 100% GB203 die. If they want to make a faster 5080 they will need to use the same die as the 5090 (GB202) which they won't want to do cause they will make far more money using the dies for basically anything else.
This is how people end up buying a 5080 and then end up in the 5080 super pre-order thread.

It's a slippery slope bud, we are here to help.
 
Last edited:
Amd only needs decent supply to gain share vs non-existent nvidia cards.
Agreed. Because people these days have such low patience and short attention span, they won't wait for NVIDIA to arrive in stock (weeks/months potentially!) and price doesn't seem to be the main drive anymore, so they might just jump on what's available, just to have something. In such case, AMD might win heavily this time, but we'll see.
 
Problem with that graph is it shows AMD gaining market share in a very small period of time. The same period Nvidia have, by all accounts, had nothing to sell.

I mean lets be real for a second... the only reason AMD are outselling Nvidia are because Nvidia doesn't have any stock and AMD does.... the second they do they will outsell AMD 10 to 1
 
Back
Top Bottom