• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

*** The AMD RDNA 4 Rumour Mill ***

Easy answer, knock 200-300 off the prices and stock will go fast
Navi 31 is expensive to produce due to the cache modules on the 7900 chips I doubt they could stomach selling them for a loss. But I do agree they were to expensive when they first came out.
 
Unfortunately not but the work AMD did for Sony with PSSR looks interesting. Fingers crossed it’s in the new cards.
They seem to be getting better at keeping the performance quiet. I'm fine with them not competing with the 5090 if they offer something at a decent price that has 7900XT+ performance with lower power draw.
 
Last edited:
I think an RDNA4 card around the 7900XT raster but with double the RT improvement, with some kind of Radeon version of dlss using an AI (think back to the recent PSSR PS5 pro talk) sounds like what they are aiming for - being the £500-600 mark is something that would be interesting.
This would be a great product IMO and so long as the performance is at that kind of level I’m very likely going to buy one.

I would obviously love to see AMD aiming big, but at the same time I would rather spend £500-600 on a solid card than £2000…
 
This would be a great product IMO and so long as the performance is at that kind of level I’m very likely going to buy one.

I would obviously love to see AMD aiming big, but at the same time I would rather spend £500-600 on a solid card than £2000…

Well till now the ray tracing and dlss side of it comparing my current card to a 7900XT gets virtually no gain, so the outlay is pointless. Others will be in a similar position and as you say many wont want to be spending between one and two grand.

The 500 pound segment should be the most competitive. Intel who hopefully can share the battlemage, and nvidia with the 5070 should present what that kind of money will get you.
 
I had a 4090 and a 7900 XTX until recently and I just don’t use them enough to justify it. I think I’m going midrange from now on. I barely play games as it is, kind of bored of throwing so much money at this hobby just so I can have the latest flashy stuff.
 
I had a 4090 and a 7900 XTX until recently and I just don’t use them enough to justify it. I think I’m going midrange from now on. I barely play games as it is, kind of bored of throwing so much money at this hobby just so I can have the latest flashy stuff.
I'm just looking at midrange these days for similar reasons. Must be getting old :cry: The pace of improvement seems to be slowing, and the hardware is well ahead of the software assuming you aren't trying to max out 4K settings on AAA games.
 
Back
Top Bottom