This is why there should be some sort of international organisation, that has a bite not just a bark, to 'enforce' laws to resolve conflict, based on human freedom and to reduce suffering and provide equal and fair opportunity for a good standard of living. I'd call this organisation UN perhaps, for Universal Normalisation, or something.
Who created these laws? What laws are they supposed to follow, ones made a single country, ones made by a committee of members, ones made by an apolitical organisation or are they supposed to create new laws? In my country I vote for a party and the party creates a law and if I don't the law I can vote to remove the party for a party which will remove the I don't like, which provides a form of checks and balances - who would do this for the laws the UN create, seen as out of 164 UN members only 57% are actual democracies, with the rest being a variety of one party states, monarchy or autocratic in nature. What if the conflict is religious in nature - as the majority of UN members are Christian what if an autocratic Muslim member attacks a democratic Christian member because they claim the Christian nation is a threat to their freedom, what about the reverse etc?
This is why there should be some sort of international organisation, that has a bite not just a bark, to 'enforce' laws to resolve conflict, based on human freedom and to reduce suffering and provide equal and fair opportunity for a good standard of living. I'd call this organisation UN perhaps, for Universal Normalisation, or something.
Again, whose freedom, whose suffering etc? There are at least two sides in any argument, what if both want freedom, if both are suffering? Should the UN be the single entity to decide and enforce laws which say "your peoples suffering and freedom doesn't count, only the other sides"?
In the real world where things are not a simplistic Good vs Bad and issues aren't black and white but shades of grey, there is no single "answer" or international law created which is fair to everyone, and there certainly never can be if unelected, unaccountable creations are allowed to create new laws with no recourse. Yes those laws may benefit someone you like initially so you think everything is fantastic with zero problems and "The Bad Guys" got what was coming to them, but those same laws can also be applied to your country too in ways you never thought about, then suddenly you're "The Bad Guy" only you don't think you are, and now those same laws you championed earlier are now effecting your freedom, making your countries population suffer and there's nothing you can do about it.
The only way these conflict resolve themselves is either violence or negotiation but most frequently a bit of both and thats the position currently held by those in power on all sides here and thats not changing anytime soon.
