There is also a little hint about texture quality - if you look at video memory usage during gameplay, it usually doesn't go above 600MB @ 1920x1080, hardcore settings. Pretty low for supposedly "best looking game".
Anyone here could compare game visuals console vs. PC version ? Is there any difference at all ? I still hope they've done just one demo for consoles + PC to make it simpler for them and what we see is not representative of what the final PC version will be like. That's the only reasonable explanation, right ? If it's final, then it is a big let down. Not because it looks bad - not at all - the Skyline map is actually quite pretty. It's just not mind-blowing, instead it looks more like console done above average. I was simply expecting more due to hype and first series setting standards so high.
And also - how can it be running with better fps than the orig. crysis ? We are speaking about games that are 3-4 years apart ! Surely if it was ever designed with PC gaming in mind - they should be able to provide quality settings that could take advantage of whatever powerful hardware the game is running on. If not to top the orig Crysis game requirements than definitely at least not making them weaker ?!? And this has nothing to do with game being better optimized. That should only provide more headroom for eye-candy. Well, that said - if the final version will be the same I won't buy it as I am not interested in console games.