The Diddler

Jay Z (oh how i would laugh) or the Bieber and have a chuckle at that nasty little runt. (Still not got over when I read he was spitting on his fans from a hotel room and stuff)
 
adam cool dude said:
I wasn't comparing the difference more how you are surprised that people would want to watch a Diddy sex tape. Weirdo's get turned on by different things.
Click to expand...

Yea, porn is nothing new but the conversation was about TV networks trying to buy the footage.

Literally the post you quoted...

Dirk Diggler said:
I'm more appalled at people apparently thinking video footage of sexual abuse is entertainment, since when was that acceptable? I know that porn has been a thing since the camera was invented, but the idea that actual media outlets are trying to purchase this footage is something else entirely.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
SPG said:
Jay Z (oh how i would laugh) or the Bieber and have a chuckle at that nasty little runt. (Still not got over when I read he was spitting on his fans from a hotel room and stuff)
Click to expand...

The speculation is that Bieber was abused by Diddy. We know as a 15 year old the teen spent time hanging out at Diddy's place who was 40 at the time. Diddy bought him a Lambo. Usher spent allot of his teenage years with Diddy, I think from the age of 11, and Diddy pretty much confessed that he got Usher laid when he was underage. There's meant to be 19 underage victims on Diddy's list of charges.

Jay Z has been accused of being 'worse than Diddy' from some women in the industry. There's accusations of mass drugging's and mass rapes of teen girls. We also know Foxy Brown was underage when Jay Z seemingly groomed her.

There is also meant to be a bigger celeb than Diddy that will be charged. So that's bigger than Jay Z
 
Last edited:
Ok so the BBrat was underage, wasn't aware of that, puts a different take on on it but he still a brat.

Really Big A lister then, who is silent in the media ATM...
 
Dirk Diggler said:
Yea, porn is nothing new but the conversation was about TV networks trying to buy the footage.

Literally the post you quoted...
Click to expand...
I think a TV agency owns the right to the John F Kennedy assassination. So TV agency’s buying the rights to questionable footage also isn’t new.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom