The Division. Are we interested?

Status
Not open for further replies.
wanderer89 said:
Tempted to upgrade my GPU for this, thinking a 390...
Click to expand...

Huh? That's a rather sideways move - are you a crab? Like Nexus said, either get another 970 for SLI, go big on a single GPU or get a Gsync screen to make the most of your 970, the 1080p one I have would work very well with your 970.

wanderer89 said:
Hmm, suppose. May have to think about getting a gaming laptop shortly anyway.
Click to expand...

The good ones are crazy expensive, might be easier to go with a SFF case and have a portable desktop type setup than go with a cray cray expensive laptop.

Or just go back to your console and resign yourself fully to the fact you are not cut out to be PCMR.

;)
 
JOSH86 said:
Huh? That's a rather sideways move - are you a crab? Like Nexus said, either get another 970 for SLI, go big on a single GPU or get a Gsync screen to make the most of your 970, the 1080p one I have would work very well with your 970.


The good ones are crazy expensive, might be easier to go with a SFF case and have a portable desktop type setup than go with a cray cray expensive laptop.

Or just go back to your console and resign yourself fully to the fact you are not cut out to be PCMR.

;)
Click to expand...

The 390 does outperform the 970 in most things, at least that's what I've read anyway :p

Thing is, I'm away from home most days now, so my PC is only being used a few days, so thought if I got a gaming laptop, could still play with you guys when I'm away, but like you said, the good ones are mega expensive...

Not going back to just a console, I'd miss PC too much :D
 
Maverick2332 said:
Is this sarcasm?

This isn't a fantasy RPG so one shot headshots are realistic depending on the enemy.
Click to expand...

Yep, I read it back this morning and realised the epic fail on my part :p I blame the lack of coffees yesterday!

hyperseven said:
You answered it yourself, this is not that, it's a Tom Clancy headlined game, you know based of realism and all that.

Unless of course I missed the dragons and elves in the DZ :p
Click to expand...

I didn't see dragons or elves in the DZ, but there sure were a lot of trolls ;) :D
 
Iirc, there is only a few fps difference on average between a 390 and 970.

JOSH86 said:
Huh? That's a rather sideways move - are you a crab?
Click to expand...

That could explain why he is so easy to kill.... :p :D

dbmzk1 said:
Another Ubisoft fail. Beta shows gameplay is not that good. Looks worse than games that run better than it. Costs a small fortune. They should just give up.
Click to expand...

Probably troll post but I'll bite anyway :p

Except most of the people who have played the beta were very pleasantly surprised and thoroughly enjoyed it....

And the game looks superb and plays fantastic even on my old PC. The only game that looks and runs better is star wars battlefront.

I won't disagree on ubi's pricing but let's wait and see some prices from grey key sites :D
 
UberGinge said:
My 970 held up well at 2560x1440, didn't really chug at all.
Click to expand...

What settings were you using?

With all ultra at 2560x1440 stark was definetly chugging with his 970, he has since upgraded to a 980ti.

I had the same experience with a single 290 on ultra at 3440x1440, though when the game launches hopefully there will be a driver update shortly after so I can crossfire.

We both dropped to high and got mainly 50+ fps but still dropped to low 40s
 
I'm not going to say its graphically the best game ever, but whoever says it looks meh needs an eye test, running around in thick snow/fog with the detail on the lighting, it does look amazing.

For a pretty big world with so much stuff going on, I think ubisoft(who I hate) did a great job.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom