Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (June Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 794 45.1%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 965 54.9%

  • Total voters
    1,759
Status
Not open for further replies.
They're paying full UK tax, I don't see why they should pay any supplement.

As Cameron\UKIP said "people should pay in before using the NHS"

You don't know if they are working full time or are getting tax credits.
Pay in before you take out. Very easy to understand. That's what I did in the US.
 
Last edited:
Logic indicates they are tainting the leave campaign with as much relation to nazi's etc as possible, because at the crux of things, that's what the start of the EU stemmed from.

It's a bad thing to do, and its a worse thing to be compared to, so they may aswell get in first by tainting the leave campaign at every opportune moment.

Yes I believe that's the propaganda technique known as Reductio ad Hitlerum
 
I just can't comprehend how anyone can make this decision based off of current arguments, for me it becomes a more anthropological decision based off the idea of humans and society in general progressing and working together to resolve issues, although Europe is far from perfect I think we are at least heading in the right direction in this sense.

I try to look at the end goal and it's obvious to me we are heading towards a more unified planet and the EU is a stepping stone towards that, being an area of so many different countries I think it's the perfect smelting pot to help us to learn how to overcome our differences and essential to our societal development.

Most of the current information going around just seems so trivial to me.
 
Last edited:
I just can't comprehend how anyone can make this decision based off of current arguments, for me it becomes a more anthropological decision based off the idea of humans and society in general progressing and working together to resolve issues, although Europe is far from perfect I think we are at least heading in the right direction in this sense.

I try to look at the end goal and it's obvious to me we are heading towards a more unified planet and the EU is a stepping stone towards that, being an area of so many different countries I think it's the perfect smelting pot to help us to learn how to overcome our differences and essential to our societal development.

Most of the information going around just seems trivial to me.


The "He's me bruvva from another muvva" stuff isn't working, the migrant crisis is testament to that, sorry. Noticed the fences going up? The right wing sentiments? "Societal development" (Christ, where do people get this stuff?) ain't working. It's a dream for dreamers. Humans are, and for the foreseeable future, will remain, tribal. When pushed this tribalism becomes more base, and there's a lot of pushing going on.
 
Last edited:
As Cameron\UKIP said "people should pay in before using the NHS"

You don't know if they are working full time or are getting tax credits.
Pay in before you take out. Very easy to understand. That's what I did in the US.

Based on that once our children turn 18 or finish school they should also pay in for certain amount of time before they can use NHS services again?
 
I don't see things improving and don't care for the politics. I will be voting to stay in! From what I've been reading, there is a lot of scaremongering around leaving and yet to have any real figures on what the benefits will be!

IN!!
 
As Cameron\UKIP said "people should pay in before using the NHS"

You don't know if they are working full time or are getting tax credits.
Pay in before you take out. Very easy to understand. That's what I did in the US.

Lets not use the US as any sort of example of how to run a health system.
 
Just back from a few days travelling and catching up with this thread. It's funny how the debates just goes around in circles. I still find it hard to believe certain posters still try and claim the EU is democratic/not heading toward an unelected superstate etc despite the evidence, and when even some remain supporters agree with that.

One thing that isn't open to debate is what's come out of the mouths of those at the heart of the EU "project", so a quick refresh might be helpful:

Jean Monnet, one of the founding fathers of the EU - “Europe’s nations should be guided towards the superstate without their people understanding what is happening. This can be accomplished by successive steps, each disguised as having an economic purpose but which will irreversibly lead to federation.”

Jose Manuel Barroso, Ex-President of the European Commission - “They must go on voting until they get it right.”

President Juncker - "We decide on something, leave it lying around, and wait and see what happens. If no one kicks up a fuss, because most people don't understand what has been decided, we continue step by step until there is no turning back."

President Juncker - “Of course there will be transfers of sovereignty. But would I be intelligent to draw the attention of public opinion to this fact?,”

President Juncker - "I'm ready to be insulted as being insufficiently democratic, but I want to be serious ... I am for secret, dark debates"

Angela Merkel on the Lisbon Treaty after the Constitution was rejected by the people of Europe - “The substance of the Constitution is preserved. That is a fact.”

Giscard d’Estaing, who drafted the EU Constitution 1997 - “One must never forget that monetary union, which the two of us were the first to propose more than a decade ago, is ultimately a political project. It aims to give a new impulse to the historic movement toward union of the European states”

Jose Manuel Barroso September 2012 - “The world needs a Europe that is capable of deploying military missions”.

Professor Otmar Issing - a former chief economist at the European Central Bank and architect of the euro - "EU elites were afraid to confront voters, delaying their plans for integration until after 2017, the year France and Germany hold national elections. The thrust of all these ideas is going through a back door towards fiscal union, voters in the end will understand what is going on. They will know they are being exploited."

I really hope we win, but I think remain is more likely at this stage, particularly given the recent tragic killing of Jo Cox and the remain camps subsequent push to smear the Brexit campaign. At least when people wake up and inevitably see what the EU is really all about (more countries, more powers, centralization of power, less democracy, less accountability etc) I can look back and have a clear conscious.
 
Only £200 a year. I'm shocked. People should have to pay their own Health insurance in my opinion.

The USA fees maybe cheaper but you've got to have way more cash to show you can support yourself.

How much should you pay then?

You don't have to earn more in the states either. You only need a gross income of $20k + $5k for any dependant person. In the UK you need a gross income of £18k.


I'm for brexit, and for controlled migration, but this whole benefits thing is a complete red herring.
 
I try to look at the end goal and it's obvious to me we are heading towards a more unified planet and the EU is a stepping stone towards that, being an area of so many different countries I think it's the perfect smelting pot to help us to learn how to overcome our differences and essential to our societal development.

It's a flight of fancy to think the world is going to be one big happy family. History says otherwise - look at all past empires.
 
I just can't comprehend how anyone can make this decision based off of current arguments, for me it becomes a more anthropological decision based off the idea of humans and society in general progressing and working together to resolve issues, although Europe is far from perfect I think we are at least heading in the right direction in this sense.

Except the EU was born out of the idea of a single market to facilitate trade. What it's morphed into now is something entirely different.

We can still work together but do so on our terms instead of a central body telling us what to do and what to spend our money on.

The Syrian migrant crisis for example was brought about because of liberal thinking eurocrats and their reluctance sending military forces to tackle ISIS headon. Crackpots like Merkel then encouraging immigrants into Europe with no forward thought as to the effect it'll have.
 
Based on that once our children turn 18 or finish school they should also pay in for certain amount of time before they can use NHS services again?

By that time the parents have put something in to the system.

Lets not use the US as any sort of example of how to run a health system.

I said it was I did in the US. There is a difference :rolleyes:
 
Except the EU was born out of the idea of a single market to facilitate trade. What it's morphed into now is something entirely different.

You do realise that UK was involved pretty much since the day one of the process of single market "morphing" into something entirely different. Past governments and representatives of this country helped create the EU of today. It's not some kind of alien entity that was forced on UK or any other EU member state, we (as in all the EU countries) created it together.
Yes some had/ have bigger say than others but it's a joined process.

By that time the parents have put something in to the system.

Yes and that was already spent (and probably more) on their education and NHS costs that they needed as children.
 
[TW]Fox;29656868 said:

If you are accepting his predictions are accurate then he also states

"but in any case there was a good chance the EU will collapse due to the migration crisis and challenges in Greece."

http://https://www.theguardian.com/business/2016/jun/09/george-soros-warns-britain-leaving-could-be-end-of-eu

So he is saying in or out the EU is likely to collapse which would obviously have a knock on affect but I would argue being out of the EU we would be better positioned to mitigate against this.
 
Last edited:
Originally Posted by deuse View Post
As Cameron\UKIP said "people should pay in before using the NHS"

You don't know if they are working full time or are getting tax credits.
Pay in before you take out. Very easy to understand. That's what I did in the US.


Posted by Bayo000 Based on that once our children turn 18 or finish school they should also pay in for certain amount of time before they can use NHS services again?

I used to work in the EC department once upon a time, during my time there EU nationals used to request an E104 certificate proving they had paid UK NI so they could get back into the health systems back home. Never saw any from the other direction. I left in 2000 I wonder if that form even still exists.
 
How much should you pay then?

As I've already said. Pay 5 years in to the system with tax credits or have your own insurance including Cancer care.

You don't have to earn more in the states either. You only need a gross income of $20k + $5k for any dependant person. In the UK you need a gross income of £18k.


I'm for brexit, and for controlled migration, but this whole benefits thing is a complete red herring.

Before you get your citizenship(up to 10 years) you have to have your own health insurance and job\place to live for that time.

Anyway back on topic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom