Poll: The EU Referendum: How Will You Vote? (June Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Remain a member of the European Union

    Votes: 794 45.1%
  • Leave the European Union

    Votes: 965 54.9%

  • Total voters
    1,759
Status
Not open for further replies.
I really hope it doesn't get overlooked and cause any breakdown in the relationship with Ireland. I'd be interested to hear the thoughts of any Irish members here as to what they think, politically and socially.

I posted earlier in the thread about this, the general consensus here is a preference for the UK to remain in. The potential for disruption the current level of trade between the two States is too great with an Exit.

Another unknown is the attitude of an future UK government with regard to its only land border with the EU. If the UK is happy to retain the common travel area, then I can't see any issues. However if immigration becomes a hot issue, I can see the border hardening. This will have political (or worse) consequences in the North.

Another unknown is the status of Irish nationals living in the UK and Vice versa in the event of an Exit.

Nate
 
Yes half of it is spent on us on our behalf by the EU, but that doesn't mean we don't actually send 350m a week, we do.

Did you actually read any of the information in the links?

What’s more, the “Total debits” number is especially misleading because it is not actually debited. That £350 million is never paid to the EU. The rebate is subtracted before the UK sends its money to Brussels. Despite Vote Leave’s language, there is no justification whatever for using the “Total debits” to the EU rather than the number that the UK actually pays—the one after the rebate.
 
I suppose it depends on whether or not you think sending even one pound a week to the EU is wrong or not. I don't care if it's £350m, or 35 pence, I would rather that money was spent here.

No, I don't mean "incorrect" as in, a poor course of action. I mean, incorrect. The claim that we send £350m a week to the EU is not true.

Whether you think it's worth it or not as a completely different question. We did discuss it earlier in this thread. I think when you worked it out using the actual figure, it amounted to a membership cost of 26p per day, per person. Personally I suspect that's a membership fee worth paying to remain a member of the EU with all the advantages and benefits that entails. You value it differently, that's fair enough.
 

Cool so at best its 248m at worst its 350m, but the point i made is still correct, why remain hate this number is due to the money we get back, however if we leave we never send it...

The issue is the word send, as we don't send it weekly i know this, the number is broken down to weekly for impact... its like showing the bill for a meal after each course not at the end of a meal, however it still costs the same
 
Last edited:
Yes half of it is spent on us on our behalf by the EU, but that doesn't mean we don't actually send 350m a week, we do.

No, no we don 't. We have covered this over and over again. At no point does the UK send £350m to the EU. The rebate is applied before we pay.
 
Bob Geldoff pro remain yet the eu is anti africa and all for imposing huge tariffs on poor countries.
 
I posted earlier in the thread about this, the general consensus here is a preference for the UK to remain in. The potential for disruption the current level of trade between the two States is too great with an Exit.

Another unknown is the attitude of an future UK government with regard to its only land border with the EU. If the UK is happy to retain the common travel area, then I can't see any issues. However if immigration becomes a hot issue, I can see the border hardening. This will have political (or worse) consequences in the North.

Another unknown is the status of Irish nationals living in the UK and Vice versa in the event of an Exit.

Nate

Thanks. That's interesting, and potentially a little worrying, personally.
 
Yes half of it is spent on us on our behalf by the EU, but that doesn't mean we don't actually send 350m a week, we do.

If I buy a car for £3000 paying £500 a month but after I paid off the car I get £1000 back, how much have I paid for the car?
 
Yes half of it is spent on us on our behalf by the EU, but that doesn't mean we don't actually send 350m a week, we do.

This has been done to death already. I'm sorry, but you're 100% wrong on that specific point.

Plus, as Prof Ian Begg of the London School of Economics notes, the rebate is deducted before any payment is made, so it is simply wrong

edit: looks like I'm a bit late to the party here :p
 
No, no we don 't. We have covered this over and over again. At no point does the UK send £350m to the EU. The rebate is applied before we pay.

your right and wrong, if we leave we don't get a rebate and we don't send anything, net result we have 248-350m when broken down into weekly chunks, its basic maths
 
The eu money we get back gets spent on stuff they choose to spend it on like art gallerys and art projects in rich areas for rich people.
"Ministers say that £38.1 million awarded through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) has been misspent or is unaccounted for, while a further £133.9 million may also have to be written off." tip of the iceberg
 
your right and wrong, if we leave we don't get a rebate and we don't send anything, net result we have 248-350m when broken down into weekly chunks, its basic maths

Using simplified figures:

The EU says "We want £350m a week from you. But you have a £200m rebate"
So we say "OK, so we are sending you £150m a week"

If we leave the EU....how does that suddenly equate to us being £350m a week better off? It doesn't...it equates to us being £150m a week better off.

So the initial claim that we send £350m a week to the EU, and by leaving, we will therefore have £350m a week to spend is mathematically incorrect and untrue.
If the claim was "We send £150m a week to the EU" (made up figures for this example notwithstanding), then it would be a fact. But it isn't.
 
The eu money we get back gets spent on stuff they choose to spend it on like art gallerys and art projects in rich areas for rich people.
"Ministers say that £38.1 million awarded through the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) has been misspent or is unaccounted for, while a further £133.9 million may also have to be written off." tip of the iceberg

Of course it does, none of it goes to underfunded parts of the UK like Cornwall and Wales :rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom