Soldato
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 7,613
The EU wont have the same power with one of its biggest contributers gone.
Dear people of the Leave camp, no-one is saying that the UK couldn't survive or make deals outside of the EU. What people are saying is that we will get a better deal as a member of the EU.
The UK is the 5th largest economy and you think no one will want to do deals with us, don't be so deluded.
We are saying we do not want to sell our democracy for a few quid.
We are saying we do not want to sell our democracy for a few quid.
The EU is not an undemocratic club; it's by far the most democratic supernational organisation on the planet. It's way more democratic that institutions such as NATO, the UN, the IMF, or the WTO. And by being part of the EU we have far greater democratic influence over the continent we're part of. Because being part of that continent is going to influence us regardless of whether we're in or out, being at the table negotiating with these other countries gives us greater control over our country.
Do you go and represent yourself on the world stage? No, you don't. You elect people to do it for you. As part of the EU, we get to directly elect representatives to go and do some of that negotiation and voting for us - alongside our nationally elected government. Outside of the EU we only have the proxy of our nationally elected government, we have no direct representatives. This is what I mean by represented by proxy.
could have phrased that better. Yes, of course, some people can study in Europe without being part of the EU, but non-EU students face higher tuition fees in most EU countries and, unlike EU students, do not have the same access to support schemes designed to ensure access for all. This means that you can only study there if you have the up-front cash to do it (or, since we're mostly talking about 18 years, if you have rich parents who are willing to pay). Because we're part of the EU that isn't true for us. This is a huge benefit.
same is true of the right to live and work. If you're non-EU you'll find it harder to get a job; you'll need to apply for, and pay for, a costly visa; you'll have less security because you won't qualify for benefits if you lose your job and may even be deported; you'll have less rights to bring your family over, and they'll also have to apply for visas; and you'll now that at any time the country you're in might arbitrarily change the rules you're allowed to stay under. All of this isn't true for us living and working in the EU (and a few bonus countries) because we're members of the EU and we enjoy the enormous benefits of free movement that it brings.
t's extremely rash to assume that we will be able to renegotiate re-entry into the Single Market as soon as we leave. And, if we do, it's almost certain that free movement will be a required part of that deal so the immigration, that's going to stay. The contributions to the EU budget? They'll stay. The big change will be that we no longer have any control over the EU rules we're bound by.
M aybe, a long time in the future, but for most - probably all - of the rest of the century, Europe is going to be a bigger trading partner than any of these countries.
Perhaps the EU citizens now have children that have grown up and are looking for jobs?
The borders have been open to EU citizens for many years now, is it not feasible that the offspring are looking for work?
The EU has repeatedly made clear - not just to us but to every country it has negotiated with - that access to the single market without free movement is a no go and we have no cards on the table that would give us the edge required to force them out of that position. We need them more than they need us, and they'll know it and we'll know it.
Democracy not in fashion this season?What democracy is that, the one where the ruling party got 37% of the vote, where another party got 4 million votes and 1 MP, whereas another party got 1.5 million votes and 56 MPs, the one where the Leave campaign seem sure the entire Govt is going to ignore the results of this referendum.....that democracy?![]()
So we're going to have free movement of people with Canada in the near future are we? When the free trade trade deal that gives them access to the single market is signed and comes into force.
Democracy not in fashion this season?
What democracy is that, the one where the ruling party got 37% of the vote, where another party got 4 million votes and 1 MP, whereas another party got 1.5 million votes and 56 MPs, the one where the Leave campaign seem sure the entire Govt is going to ignore the results of this referendum.....that democracy?![]()
You seem confused. CETA does not enter Canada into the single market.
Mr Jack said:The EU has repeatedly made clear - not just to us but to every country it has negotiated with - that access to the single market without free movement is a no go and we have no cards on the table that would give us the edge required to force them out of that position. We need them more than they need us, and they'll know it and we'll know it.
It gives them access to the single market, which is what you said.
So we're going to have free movement of people with Canada in the near future are we? When the free trade trade deal that gives them access to the single market is signed and comes into force.
All I can say is that I'm glad you'll never have to negotiate on my behalf...
And, again, it doesn't. Go and read it. The CETA does give Canada substantial tariff free trade with the EU but it does not enter them into the single market and, particularly significantly for the UK, does not cover much at all in the way of services.
No - it gives them access to the single market but not freedom of movement which according to you the EU would never accept.
It's important to be accurate here
Michael Gove stated his preferred post-Brexit option is to have access to the single market but not be in the single market - so they are two distinct positions.
No - it gives them access to the single market but not freedom of movement which according to you the EU would never accept. It's important to be accurate here, Michael Gove stated his preferred post-Brexit option is to have access to the single market but not be in the single market - so they are two distinct positions.
No - it gives them access to the single market but not freedom of movement which according to you the EU would never accept. It's important to be accurate here, Michael Gove stated his preferred post-Brexit option is to have access to the single market but not be in the single market - so they are two distinct positions.