Associate
This thread is completely ridiculous.
It's GD, what did you expect
This thread is completely ridiculous.
It's GD, what did you expect
If you want information rather than memes, animated gifs and GD style hot air there's a thread in Speakers Corner that may be a better proposition, one of the posters there made a keen observation on this thread.
"Personally I haven't decided yet - I am very bored of the know-nothing preachers on both sides in the GD thread - I took a look in and rolled my eyes and the pseudo-intellectual claptrap and downright disdain for the plebiscite in general"
https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showthread.php?t=18719504
This is a blatant misuse of public funds.
How so? This is how governments operate. They bring in advisors when they need them and this comes with a price tag. It's politics.
This is not a general election. But tell me why the other tory MPs are not allowed the same funds?
Oh that's right because Cameron said they can't.
This is not a general election. But tell me why the other tory MPs are not allowed the same funds?
Oh that's right because Cameron said they can't.
Wut? Advisors advise and this service falls under government expenditure. All democracies work this way.
Did you miss the news when Cameron said his tory IN party can use public funds but the Tory OUT can't.
Now remember both sides are in government. This is not tory vs labour.
But only the IN is the official stance of the Government
But only the IN is the official stance of the Government
Exactly.
Jeez, sometimes it's like pulling teeth on these forums.
But only the IN is the official stance of the Government
Exactly.
Jeez, sometimes it's like pulling teeth on these forums.
But we're not talking about Conservative Party Funds, we're talking about public money. You wouldn't expect the incumbent government to use public funds to campaign for their re-election or to make party political broadcasts would you?
Whilst I have no problem with the government having an official stance and their leader making their PARTY funds only available to those that agree with it, public money shouldn't be used (or restricted) for one side of the argument in a referendum.
As said I think that's unfair and a misuse of my money. Both sides should fund themselves.
It's GD, what did you expect
Michael Gove is on the other side and because of this he is facing the sack.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/new...ck-over-his-opposition-to-European-Union.html
The official government line is what funding supports, not the opposition as that would be self defeating and pointless.
But we're not talking about Conservative Party Funds, we're talking about public money. You wouldn't expect the incumbent government to use public funds to campaign for their re-election or to make party political broadcasts would you?
Whilst I have no problem with the government having an official stance and their leader making their PARTY funds only available to those that agree with it, public money shouldn't be used (or restricted) for one side of the argument in a referendum.