Soldato
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2010
- Posts
- 6,316
neither side has - like I said you're asking for a crystal ball there
Not really.
The In campaign has:
- Treaties going all the way back to the EEC
- EU's current trade deals we have access to
- UK's special exemptions
- The newly negotiated deal with known text and process for ratification in the EUP
- Policy documents and proceeding of the EUP, recorded and available for access
- Our trade figures and forecasts for future trade
- Our estimated and historic contribution figures
- Our current and forecast migration figures
- Our Government's stance on the above
- Clear and legally binding exit protocol, with a non-negotiable time period and red-lines from the EC, which to take apart and rightly highlight as a big risk
- EC status on the above -- they want us in on the condition of the deal that was agreed
A pretty good idea of the status quo. Might get a Eurozone treasury set-up, might not. Might get an agreement on wider participation in the European battle group, might not. But the core is there, and it shall remain. What our government then gets up to in Europe is down to them, and the people who shall vote for them. I doubt Cameron will rock the boat much on his way out upon a successful In vote.
What does the other side have?
...
An economically illiterate promise -- their grand, fact-free charade:
- Wish for a plan that unfortunately cannot be given since too much is uncertain
- No firm comittments on stances re migration and trade, since they are hopelessly split
- No power to put anything they say into effect
- Some alarmist media claptrap, and more of the same from the old dinosaurs that lost in '72
- Politicians you would not take advice from even if your nation was purely in your head, and it was a mental asylum
Hmm. Which is the leap in the dark? In my view, the Leave campaign should start writing something down other than inane, regurgitated critique of the stuff that is easily checked and in the public domain already.
If they choose to fight ancient battles, blare megaphone propaganda and make wild claims against the status quo -- the burden of proof rests with them.
Last edited: