Poll: The EU Referendum: What Will You Vote? (New Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?


  • Total voters
    1,204
Status
Not open for further replies.
I am right in thinking that if we vote out. There will be a period where our government works stuff out. Then we give notice to the EU and then we're locked in for at least 2 years notice period.


Plus any time required for extra negotiations
 
I am right in thinking that if we vote out. There will be a period where our government works stuff out. Then we give notice to the EU and then we're locked in for at least 2 years notice period.


Plus any time required for extra negotiations


Nobody knows. But when we do vote out others will follow.
 
That's not the point your linked article raises, Insanties. Why are you using instances of grave sexual offences perpetrated by native Brits to argue against EU immigration? How does sexual abuse in Rotherham connect to Islamic extremism? What has it got to do with Romanians? What has any of it got to do with the EU referendum?

The six sentences handed out were to four British Asian men and two White British women. Their actions were condemned by both communities in the town, and they were prosecuted to the full extent of the law. Further inquiries are ongoing, including into the local police force by the IPCC. And the situation is similar in Rochdale.
It was an investigation launched because of the rochdale / rotherham / sheffield / elsewhere rapes that went undercover. I wasn't implicating all one million to be part of migrant crime but this is in correlation with the crimes that were reported earlier which were deemed to be largely muslim caused. While they are now looking at it for nationwide impact it's still relevant to recognise that despite what many claim as being such a small % of our population there were communities which engaged in prolific sex abuse. Not to mention it says it is Rotherhams MP which was the one that is currently having the reports we know are in relation to immigrants, just because they wrap up the story in a more politically correct way (remember that critical thinking thing?) and then throw out a magic number of what 'could be' doesn't mean that it deflects from the argument there was still widespread abuse from certain communities and this report is originating from what happened in Rotherham.

I never said anything about them pieces all connecting other than to state that the argument that all immigration is a benefit due to economics is ignoring the situation on the ground. I was just a little tired of the fist bumping over saying migration is perfect from some in the argument who ignore the issues raied from various sources each time it comes up, greasing the wheels of the economy is sweet and all but I think there's sometimes other considerations. I simply said there is some issues brought about by immigration that goes ignored and we need to be more selective in regards to immigration / how we approach it. It's more a general statement of dismay at the failures of our government than it is a direct 'lets get out of EU' tirade as the EU is more european immigrants which you'll notice I mostly didn't raise any voice against. In relation to the referendum though it's in linked with my next post that a brexit could actually cause a rethinking (even of international law hopefully) of migration practice considering the migration crisis, EU will fail and burn if Hungary, Austria etc. keep not doing there part while the UK leaves, Germany keeps flooding itself, Spain and Greece run out of cash and eventually want to give up themselves, racism and groups like sons of odin and others keep going on the rise. Tensions, failures, protests, more migrant crimes, the EU project having ot stem the flow etc. along with a brexit could cause a big rethink on modern migration as we've seen it's unsustainable and that's if the middle east has no other issues and more african nations don't fail and we don't let turkey in the EU etc. I'm guessing at least one will happen. We need a rethink on migration and I think brexit is the rebellion that will show that.

And plenty of criminals deny there crimes even while in the courts with the evidence against them. Communities decrying the issue doesn't mean much because some lie and some speak and don't speak for everyone (e.g. when we have protests, you can have people protesting for both sides so they don't both speak for the community as a whole).
 
Last edited:
I am right in thinking that if we vote out. There will be a period where our government works stuff out. Then we give notice to the EU and then we're locked in for at least 2 years notice period.


Plus any time required for extra negotiations
not sure about the extra time but yes, 2 year seperation period where we can renegotiate trade while still maintaining current trade standards due to EU being a big machine so it's harmful to just pull and run. We're given 2 years to sort things out and renegotiate.
 
I want out now ...But I think I voted to stay in few weeks back.

I don't think us being out of Europe will be a big deal.

We don't have the euro so I see no point in being in it.

I was leaning out but I'm an almost certain out now barring some huge revelation showing us that the world will end if we leave. The Eurozone is going to be a complete mess a little down the line with such massively disparate economies. I'll be surprised if Greece don't leave the single currency for starters.

I'd prefer to keep Farage away from the campaign frontline because however correct he may be on certain points, he's potentially toxic to voters. Immigration is only one small part of the argument and I'd rather we had a broader discussion than that. Equally, the FUD coming from Remain is pretty disappointing.

There's the added bonus that a vote to leave has a good chance of us saying bye bye to CMD and Gideon. ;)

As for this thread - it's becoming apparent that most of those that have made up their mind aren't changing it very easily. It's comical seeing people posting until they're blue in the face and getting nowhere. :p
 
Last edited:
I agree about Farage, however watching that clip posted earlier what a great speaker, he really knows how to connect with people, flawed in so many ways but engaging at the same time
 
As for this thread - it's becoming apparent that most of those that have made up their mind aren't changing it very easily. It's comical seeing people posting until they're blue in the face and getting nowhere. :p

Well it's always worth posting to argue against false points and to inform / reawaken other issues. I'm a lot more pro EU than I started thanks to all the reading but it only led me to realise there was nonsensical arguments on both sides. Whether it be safety in europe and bigger global presence (never materialised, no presence in syria, middle east tyrants, russia annexing crimea, mexico drug wars, china builing islands in the sea, kim jong un, jihadi's travelling to syria and back for fun etc.) or whether it's anti EU arguments like freedom of movement which we'll no doubt end up signed up to anyway since the EU is like pulling teeth and don't compromise on anything if we want to trade with them.

There's been benefits to the EU like human rights, investment, economic stability, better relations with EU.

There's negatives to EU like forcing ever more laws from the top, outsourcing democracy to 27 other countries for slow action and disputes on every issue along with fighting to make quick sensible actions in our own country, the EU may be looking to prop up TTIP if news articles are correct etc.

In the end we'll have 2 years to renegotiate trade deals as well so I feel the economic argument is weakened, I feel migration will occur one way or the other so that is a moot point. We'll always trade anyway so yeah, a lot of the arguments won't be as dramatic as people want to make it out to be and in the end we'll live one way or another but it's just whether you support the vision the EU entails and trust in there leadership (I have a hard time trusting it when it entails 27 other nations voting on self interest rather than just our own mp's voting on our own issues). In the end you read the worst, you crack out the FUD, you realise half the stuff is scaremongering as to what scale it will effect us and then you vote based on which future you think makes sense. I don't trust the EU to last based on there failures during the migration crisis (Erdogan insulting them for not giving promised money months down the line, not stepping in to make sure germany wasn't acting over zealously, unable to keep there laws enforced with Austria and Hungary putting caps on migration, unable to stem the flow even with outside help from turkey, slow to erect any borders / protection or support the member nations etc.) Not to mention there negotiations in britains referendum highlighted how quickly self interest flares up and how little compromise we can expect on any future issues. I feel the EU is a sinking ship sooner or later, better out now and reshape the future later as it'll be damaging if it breaks down later anyway but others might disagree. Still, you don't learn anything by putting your fingers in your ears, I gave the EU a chance and I felt disappointed as there's always news of issues, slow action, worry of TTIP (with EU officials placating exxon mobil) migration crisis, there direct lie about the cologne sex attacks, there lack of willingness to compromise etc. It's good in some ways but it's just a question of leadership for me, do I trust votes of 27 countries to work for local issues? No. Do I trust the EU leaders have the right mindset and have displayed great leadership? No (schengen falling apart, don't trust TTIP, don't like the forcing of ever closer union or the political environment etc.). I'd love a joined up EU, it makes sense but it should be about economics, I don't even mind freedom of movement and giving money to poorer EU countries to lift up the EU scene but the EU is a failure just like they let Greece in and then couldn't do a thing to help them and then blame them for migrants getting through (like they have millions of resources to stop it). I simply feel it's a question of leadership and the future, we need a future where we don't outsource democracy in my opinion and we don't bang heads with 27 other countries each time over laws that should be dealt with in the UK. When they're ready to make an EU that benefits everyone economically without trying to ethnically and politically rewrite everything from the top then I'll be cool with it.
 
Last edited:
[TW]Fox;29223317 said:
Shows the danger of headlines that doesn't it? Turns out he is 47 and commited the crime when he was 20!



Doesn't matter when it did it. Under the old visa system he wouldn't be let in.
This why I like the aussi\US system. Keeps scum like this out.
 
Lol deuse, will you never learn

Maybe you like rapists ;)

It's like saying "if your a serial killer\rapist but you was young when you did it. Come on in"

But now we know the IN Crowd don't mind rapists from another country coming here...hmmm makes you think.
 
Last edited:
Maybe you like rapists ;)

Yea, that's right, that's exactly the inference you can take from that :rolleyes:

Or since the daily fail article (surprise surprise) doesn't even go into any details of the incident, apart from it happened at a party while they were drunk, how do you know it wasn't a case of regret and accusation of non consent after the event?

Answer: you don't, you just want to jump straight to the conclusion he is a preying paedophile rapist....but maybe the Judge with more information in front of him than you, getting no further than a daily fail headline, and the record of no other similar incidents in 25 years led him to an informed judgement

Or maybe he just likes rapists too :rolleyes:

deuse said:
But now we know the IN Crowd don't mind rapists from another country coming here...hmmm makes you think.

Yea, it makes one think you're an ***** and there's a village somewhere missing theirs :p
 
Last edited:
All these outers who believe we should leave to stop immigration are going to be hilarious if we leave the EU and then grant the same free movement rights as part of the price to join the EEA.
 
Yea, that's right, that's exactly the inference you can take from that

Yep.

We ask on the visa form if they plan on raping anyone
Problem solved.

In the visa system that will come back in. The UK Gov will know everything about the person, just like the USA does.

Oh and don't worry about the cost as the person who wants to come here pays for it all.
 
In the visa system that will come back in. The UK Gov will know everything about the person, just like the USA does.

How on earth do you think you know that? In fact, we don't have a clue what kind of immigration system the UK will have if we vote for Brexit; you don't even know whether Brexit will end free movement at all.

Oh and don't worry about the cost as the person who wants to come here pays for it all.

That'll be just great for our tourist industry and education sector, I'm sure.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom