Poll: The EU Referendum: What Will You Vote? (New Poll)

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?

  • Total voters
    1,204
Status
Not open for further replies.
phil675 said:
It's only going to ramp up as the weather gets better. The great of exodus of 2015 is going to repeat itself every year until something drastic is done. I think Germany are predicting 3.6Mil more people this year so it will likely be higher.

Assuming they get through the joke of a border, what are we going to do with all those people?
Click to expand...

This was on Question Time that they couldn't answer except the political party line followed by it's our duty. As people in the audience said, where are they all going to go? None of them wanted to answer it except with flannel.
 
deuse said:
(cough) Nangpa La shooting incident (cough)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Gun_Ri_Massacre

Loads more but it's double bacon sandwich time hmmmmmmm
Click to expand...

1. That was during wartime.
2. They weren't refugees being killed by the country they were seeking refuge in.
3. It was 66 years ago.

Now, none of those things lessen the impact of that massacre, but it's hardly relevant.
 
Skunkworks said:
Texas and Arizona have Stand Your Ground laws.
Click to expand...

So a few rednecks take the law into their own hands, misusing a self-defence statute for sporting murder as they go, makes it suddenly the stance of the American and Mexican governments and their law enforcement officers regarding refugees, and is somehow related to the Syrian crisis? Right...

Furthermore, the law they clutch on to for cover is under review in Texas, the USA and the UN. But even under the rather vague implementation of the castle doctrine as it stands, you still have to prove self-defence beyond reasonable doubt.

The vigilante case may take a while do dismantle in the court of law, but they won't be treated any different to any other murderer afterwards, whatever their 'reckonings' were.
 
datalol-jack said:
So a few rednecks take the law into their own hands, misusing a self-defence statute for sporting murder as they go, makes it suddenly the stance of the American and Mexican governments and their law enforcement officers regarding refugees, and is somehow related to the Syrian crisis? Right...
Click to expand...
Official policy was never mentioned in the exchange:
deuse said:
Don't forget the farmers have a right to shoot anyone that trespasses their land.
Click to expand...
Mr Jack said:
No. They don't.
Click to expand...
Skunkworks said:
Texas and Arizona have Stand Your Ground laws.
Click to expand...
 
Gilly said:
Stand your ground laws don't allow you to just kill anyone that's on your land though :confused:
Click to expand...
A point often missed by the admirers of white-supremacist thuggery. :o

Skunkworks said:
True, but it makes it very easy to do just that.
Click to expand...

Doesn't mean they do. Because some do, doesn't make it not murder nor gives them the right to it. That it is also not the country's policy or can be construed as such, goes without saying. No-one has the right to fire at and kill refugees under international law.
 
datalol-jack said:
Doesn't mean they do. Because some do, doesn't make it not murder nor gives them the right to it. That it is also not the country's policy or can be construed as such, goes without saying. No-one has the right to fire at and kill refugees under international law.
Click to expand...
It has already been explained to you that the comment was specifically in response to land owners and trespassers, not US policy and refugees.

Now stop being a weasel.
 
deuse said:
it is illegal for the boarder control to kill the illegals.
Click to expand...

but you just used the border agency having assault rifles as proof they shot illegals trying to cross regularly?

now you're saying its illegal?

so you're saying America has roving gangs of murderers hunting down and murdering illegal immigrants along the border?
 
deuse said:
They was lucky. Some countries would have shoot the lot. Yes I did read but you don't like my answer...tough.
Click to expand...

deuse said:
USA\Mexico them kind of places.
Click to expand...

deuse said:
Next time you got to the US\Texas go to the boarder fence and watch ;)
The Texas farmers have to protect themselves. And why do you think they give the boarder agency assault rifles?
Click to expand...

deuse said:
Farmers find dead bodies a lot of the time. It is illegal for the boarder control to kill the illegals.
Don't forget the farmers have a right to shoot anyone that trespasses their land.
Click to expand...
 
Tefal said:
but you just used the border agency having assault rifles as proof they shot illegals trying to cross regularly?

now you're saying its illegal?

so you're saying America has roving gangs of murderers hunting down and murdering illegal immigrants along the border?
Click to expand...

In short: Here's deuse-y! :D

maxresdefault.jpg
 
deuse said:
I think they're scum and law breaking scum at that. Ramming a fence of a country they do not belong to is a criminal offence
Click to expand...

But ramming a fence of a country you do belong to isn't a criminal offence? :confused:

They was lucky. Some countries would have shoot the lot. Yes I did read but you don't like my answer...tough.
Click to expand...

WERE it's WERE, you say was in this context so often, *sigh*, if you don't want to come across as a total thicket it would help if you got to grasp with the basics of your own language.

Also it's "Some countries would have shot the lot" - Now write this out 100 times and if it's not done before sunrise, I'll cut your balls off




Edit : Just seen another post of yours

USA\Mexico them kind of places.
Click to expand...

It's Those....USA/Mexico those kind of places.....are you really so clueless over your own language?
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom