Soldato
- Joined
- 20 Feb 2004
- Posts
- 4,028
- Location
- Blyth, Northumberland
Leave, then rebuild the Empire.
Leave.
EU cultural marxism was always doomed to failure, just like it's parent USSR with economical marxism. Bad trees can't give good fruits.
Only a united Europe can defeat ISIS.
I can't see leaving the EU would stop us from co-operating with the rest of Europe to achieve the common goal of eliminating ISIS.
Leaving the EU would make intelligence sharing slower and more difficult.
Why? Would the intelligence agencies suddenly lose all the phone numbers of their European counterparts the day after leaving the EU?
In = status quo. Proven financial benefits for the country, some pressure from Poles/Romanians/etc. in the menial jobs sectors.
Out = Unpredictable financial consequences, more Indian/Pakistani/African immigrants, end of freedom of movement in the EU for Brits, barriers for British companies when expanding in the second largest economy on the planet.
Only a united Europe can defeat ISIS.
So do you regret the mass immigration of Asians and Africans in 50s and 60s or were they better class of brown immigrant than today?
Out. The sooner, the better!
No, but we'd lose European Arrest Warrant powers and lose access to EUROJUST.
And if our laws aren't harmonised with Europe, transferring data and detainees can be more complex from a legal standpoint.
Nothing to do with the EU
Everything to do with NATO, please don't peddle lies
Intelligence agencies and sharing will not suddenly stop or be more difficult. We work closest with the USA in such regards, we have no problem doing that, despite not being part of the USA.
I repeat, immigrants are a vital resource for the economy and it's irrelevant where they come from.
Britain could decrease the non-Eu immigration, which consists of people from far different cultures, lower skills etc. This would be much easier than the adventure of leaving the EU.
I'm going with the opposite of whatever this guy says.
So, IN!