Poll: The EU Referendum: What Will You Vote?

Should the United Kingdom remain a member of the European Union or leave the European Union?


  • Total voters
    790
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not true. We buy more from the EU then we sell to them.
Also the Lisbon Treaty stipulates that the EU must make a trade agreement with a country which leaves the EU.

I believe the WTO rules lay down basic rules for international trade by which both the EU and UK are obliged to abide.
So all this nonsense about trade with the EU if we left is just silly.


I'll go further to say we will be better off as we can start doing trade with our old friends the Commonwealth.

I'm in no way an expert but surely there are some form of tax implications of trading into and out of the block? (I'm not certain of this I will freely admit) plus will there then be issues around multinationals moving employees into and out of the UK (which they can currently do pretty freely)

As I said I would like to see more information if/when it came to a vote but I would be very cautious of taking the implications lightly.
 
In time all Europeans will join as one i think, Even the slavs like Russia might one day join. For us we really are in a gold spot members of the EU (732m odd people) to trade and the bonus of sharing language with Australia, Canada, USA, New Zealand.


A hell of a lot of good consumer protection and roaming laws came recently which helps. Infact the only thing ****ing me off about the actual EU is the leadership at the very top, Waste and red tape and immigration into it. The only reason the Tories want us out is it makes it easier to prey on your average johnny who has way more rights and protection with the EU.
 
I doubt many in here really has enough information to form an informed opinion.

As some have eluded to...do we really trust the government to be let of the leash?
 
:confused:

Holiday visas are very simple. Working/permanent visas a lot less so. Leaving the EU would give lawyers plenty of more work. I guess that's one positive?

No lawyers needed. We used to fill in the forms needed and they was sent off.
It was a great way of keeping tabs on who they\us was letting in.

I'm in no way an expert but surely there are some form of tax implications of trading into and out of the block? (I'm not certain of this I will freely admit) plus will there then be issues around multinationals moving employees into and out of the UK (which they can currently do pretty freely)

As I said I would like to see more information if/when it came to a vote but I would be very cautious of taking the implications lightly.

The tax is so low that the EU Common Market is basically redundant as a customs union with tariff walls.

I think I'm right in saying that Norway and Switzerland are not in the EU, yet they export far more per capita to the EU than the UK does.
So the EU membership is not a prerequisite for a healthy trading relationship.

Again I think I'm right in saying the UK do more trading out side of the EU(maybe someone can put me right. here)
In my opinion we will be much better off leaving the EU. Wouldn't you like the UK law made by the people we vote in?
 
What I vote come the referendum will depend on the situation at that time, which could be 2 years plus away. A lot can happen before then. So right now, the poll here needs an "undecided" option.

If the real poll was today, and the only information was that available today, I'd vote leave. So I have, here. But my mind might change by the time the real thing arrives.
 
Out so we can control our borders and not become another Sweden.

I don't know, living in one of the happiest countries in the World doesn't sound so bad to me. Then again Switzerland tops the list and they're not an EU member but they are a member of the single market.

The Visa way is the best way for people to come and go.

The visa way we can check who they are and if they are right for the UK.
The same can be said about brits leaving the UK. Tried to get in to the USA with out a Visa?

The way it is now if 10,000 IS terrorist wanted to come here and had EU passport we couldn't stop them.

Except for the limitations on grounds of public policy, public safety or public health. If an IS terrorist is identified then you'd be able to refuse them on either public policy or public safety and probably both if necessary.

I think I'm right in saying that Norway and Switzerland are not in the EU, yet they export far more per capita to the EU than the UK does.
So the EU membership is not a prerequisite for a healthy trading relationship.

Views seem to vary even within Norway on whether it's a good thing or not to be outside of the EU - some like it as it is, some think that they should be outside the EEA and others think they should be part of the EU proper. With their current situation they do have to implement directives but they get no say in them and it costs them money despite having no voting rights - you can debate whether it's cheaper in or out, how much of the contributions are offset by subsidies in return and whether the price paid for having a say in policy is worthwhile or not but opinions vary.

It's a pretty complicated beast though with an awful lot of interconnected strands so you'd have to be very sure that if you unravelled one part you were happy with the potential repercussions through the law of unintended consequences.

//edit - looking at the voting in the poll there's probably only one or two names that I recognise who've voted differently to what I'd have expected. That's probably a sign I've been here too long.
 
Stay in. Shouldn't be a referendum.

I certainly disagree with that. There are several reasons why there should be a referendum on being in the EU, not least, that there never has been, so being in has no mandate from the people.

If we have a vote and the result is leave, then clearly it's not the will of the people to be in. Buf if the vote is to remain, then it provides categoric proof that that is the will of the people, meaning it then does have a mandate.
 
How do you know what French immigration policy would be if we left the EU? Why wouldn't there be a simple, cheap process for eg. those in work? :confused:

Because, unsurprisingly, France already has a visa system for non-EU nationals. The Swiss get a free pass, the rest have to apply through their employer. As I said, it depends on how vindictive the EU members wanted to be.

They do, however, have nice pensions/help stop the property market getting even worse/spend money in the economy/etc. Personally, I could envisage them requiring people to have health insurance, but I can't see them turfing out all the Brits... nor would we magically turf out all the Spaniards. Neither of those moves would be rational.

It's an unknown. There's certainly a lot of resentment in Spain about British retirees not integrating with the local community. Most of their money stays in the ex-pat community.
 
In it to win it.

The EU needs reform yes, but leaving would be economic suicide.

Yes, because we were an absolute mess before we joined the EU (note: EU, not "Europe") and couldn't trade with the USA or China... Oh hang on!

While I agree that there are benefits to being in the EU, it's a mess as it stands. If Cameron doesn't get any meaningful reforms then I'll be heading from "in" to "out".
 
... but leaving would be economic suicide.

That is really the essential question, if the country can maintain a reasonable economy outside the EU I'll be voting to leave. I don't believe you can state it definitely would be economic suicide to leave, Europe benefits from trading with the UK so is hardly likely to cut off its nose to spite its face ...
 
Thing is, the EU is as much ideological as it is economic. I'm not sure that is a good thing, but it is what it is.
 
Do any/all of the "in" voters support greater integration?

How do they feel about being a state in a new federal Europe? Joining the single currency, losing our opt-outs, and generally becoming like a US state.

Blair talked about joining the Euro eventually, and it seems unlikely that the UK could be on the fringe forever. I think if the rest of the EU presses ahead with greater integration, the UK would have to commit to that also.

And that's what the EU wants. Greater integration, more unification and standardisation of national apparatus. Who knows what the UK would look like fully unified with the EU.

Frankly, I think "out" is the only choice where we aren't assimilated, Borg-style, into an EU collective (eventually).
 
A common currency with disparate economies is at best naive and at worst completely idiotic. How the hell it hasn't fallen to pieces yet is a mystery to me. Greece are going to feel the pain of it for a long time to come.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom