Now who is being relevant? Certainly not you.
Try to keep up, my post wasn't even about the tackle, your post was about Rooney's reaction being bad enough to tell you how bad it was, AND that Rooney isn't one to complain. My post was entirely based on those two facts, using a recent game where Rooney beyond what I've seen anyone do before complained about every minor little thing like someone on his team had been murdered.
If you can't see the relevance there I really don't know. When I point this out to you, you suddenly go off on a completely different tangent about the tackle..... which in regards to you having a go at me over one post....... wasn't even being talked about. The post was entirely about how Rooney reacts to things.
So what are you even entering a discussion about the tackle for?
Did I state anywhere in my post that Rooney isn't one to complain? Or are you just making things up to get your point across, which I still don't fully understand.
Your point isn't relevant at all - read back where I wrote what the conversation might be if that is indeed the way that the referee saw it. Is it ok not to card someone because it was Wayne Rooney who appealed? In the past he's appealed for a throw in that wasn't theirs so he's obviously a liar.
"Ref, that's a 2 footed lunge, send him off"
"No Mr Rooney, you're a naughty lad, you threw a right temper tantrum in the last game so I'm not going to listen to you"
Do you really think that's what referee's do?
I didn't go off on a tangent about the tackle, it is what is being discussed in the thread, is this where you're struggling to join in because you have the wrong end of the stick?
I didn't have a go at you, I just pointed out an observation I had made whilst browsing the boards, can you honestly say you talk sense in most of your posts? I must have misinterpreted when people have dismissed you in the past. Apologies.
