Soldato
They do if they are not held back by temps or power limit, both of which can be changed via software.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
They do if they are not held back by temps or power limit, both of which can be changed via software.
Associate
Looks like it's down to the indivdual retailer then or i guess official RMA. Glad you're getting it sorted.
Soldato
Cheers much better with monitoring on.
Associate
Associate
Caporegime
Did the AMD run and just need to do the Titan X run, which will be done after work. At least it is easy to install drivers and switch lanes. DDU makes life simple
Associate
Did the AMD run and just need to do the Titan X run, which will be done after work. At least it is easy to install drivers and switch lanes. DDU makes life simple
using this;
"Download Display Driver Uninstaller DDU" ?
PS when saying switch lane Greg, do you mean physical switch off then swap around the GPU's ?
Last edited:
Associate
Did the AMD run and just need to do the Titan X run, which will be done after work. At least it is easy to install drivers and switch lanes. DDU makes life simple
Just out of interest is it not possible to leave both sets of drivers installed and disable/enable each card as needed?
Soldato
No, nvidia drivers tend to interfere with AMD ones.
Caporegime
Yer, that's the one. I have both cards installed on PCI-E x16 slots and just switch one on and the other off via mobo switches. Connect the monitor to the one I am using and off I go. Takes less than 2 minutes to do that and install drivers.
It is but I don't want any conflicts, so better to just have the AMD drivers or Nvidia drivers on depending on the card being used. Saves any grief and with this lot, they will rip anything apart that isn't 100% fair
Soldato
Yer, I have done
Oddly, the VRAM usage on the Fury is half of what it is on the TX.... Any idea's? Memory compression perhaps?
Possibly.
http://www.extremetech.com/gaming/2...erformance-power-consumption-and-4k-scaling/2
Suspended
Well i have to say i'm not a sharp eyed one, who picks on everything, but in the last BF video the difference is clearly standing out in IQ on the Furys favor.
At the start blurred road and lines on the road on TX
Curb and road looks washed/blurred on TX
Again road surface and signs on the road are crappy looking
Line on the road seems to wash away a few meters from viewpoint while on FX it runs to the distance
Building in the back are much sharper on FX although it is further back viewpoint
Blue roadsign is sharp on the FX a blurred mess on TX
I do not play BF so i'm not a pro, but those caught my eye in the video.
Thanks for the effort Gregster, those are great comparisons.
I'm with you on this one, the Image quality on the Titan-X is pretty poor.
Not as much detail as the Fury-X, it is blurry and washed-out. There is also a lot more ghosting on the TX, Despite the TX apparently rendering higher FPS its not actually putting them on screen, hence the ghosting.
Last edited:
Associate
Presumably no way to disable the driver itself without un-installation, since normally you would only use one vendor at a time anyway.
Associate
Yer, that's the one. I have both cards installed on PCI-E x16 slots and just switch one on and the other off via mobo switches. Connect the monitor to the one I am using and off I go. Takes less than 2 minutes to do that and install drivers.
It is but I don't want any conflicts, so better to just have the AMD drivers or Nvidia drivers on depending on the card being used. Saves any grief and with this lot, they will rip anything apart that isn't 100% fair
Lol. Yeah i've lurking long enough to know the grief you occasionally get.
Associate
Yer, that's the one. I have both cards installed on PCI-E x16 slots and just switch one on and the other off via mobo switches. Connect the monitor to the one I am using and off I go. Takes less than 2 minutes to do that and install drivers.
It is but I don't want any conflicts, so better to just have the AMD drivers or Nvidia drivers on depending on the card being used. Saves any grief and with this lot, they will rip anything apart that isn't 100% fair
>> this "via mobo switches"
on board motherboard switches ?
sorry for hassle very interested in doing this atm, thanks Greg.
What? Ghosting = not real fps?
its a LOD difference between amd and nvidia on driver level. Also the colors on amd are a bit better. You change your LOD settings with radeonpro if you want
Caporegime
Yer, I have a Rampage IV Formula that has PCI-E lane switches (4 of them) and I can switch lanes off and on with the switches.
Associate
never knew that option existed on motherboards, and very nice to know. thanks Greg.
Caporegime
Suspended
If if there is no new frame it will refresh the old one. Because its the same frame its effectively two of the same frame on screen at slightly different positions causing an overlap that results in ghosting. The FPS counter reads output. That includes multiple of the same frame from the cache. This is very different to what is actually rendering in the GPU. FX seems to be rendering more new frames while the TX is refreshing old ones.