-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread
- Thread starter Kaapstad
- Start date
Looks like overclocking memory on Fury X actually has some gains in games afterall.
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/937-26/overclocking-gpu-fiji.html
Biggest benefits were in Batman AO (4.6%) and Hitman (4.3%), when memory where overclocked by 8% (from 500 to 540).
What's interesting is that in Batman memory overclocking gave actually bigger results than overclocking core.
http://www.hardware.fr/articles/937-26/overclocking-gpu-fiji.html
Biggest benefits were in Batman AO (4.6%) and Hitman (4.3%), when memory where overclocked by 8% (from 500 to 540).
What's interesting is that in Batman memory overclocking gave actually bigger results than overclocking core.
DP needs his eyes testing thenit's very clear to see what GPU is outputting a more higher detailed images..
It's night and day difference.. But what I do know is messing with LOD does show quite massive gains in frame rate.
Making a more detailed image does not necessarily require increased load, e.g. look at Antialiasing, the higher the level the less detail there is.
Anyway, all of this is a complete red herring as gregster didn't have the same video capture properties on the same cards.
You should compare screen shots, there is really nothing in it, unless you are a fanboy.
Soldato
Greg did have the same settings used he redone the video using 30mbs, same capture hardware, same hardware only change was the GPUs and drivers..
I have asked for images, and even in another thread another user has agreed his 780 shows same level of detail so something is clearly wrong with battlefield 4 on nvidia hardware..
Instead taking it so hard maybe back this and see if nvidia can fix it.. Who knows might just be a game bug or worst nvidia is indeed reducing graphics settings to look better. I would like to believe this isn't the case,but ask yourself based on that screenshot side by side would you pick the extra frame rate over the IQ?
Soldato
Don't make a fool of yourself, Shanks
I haven't seena single review note that there is any IQ difference so it is most likely a setup issue, e.g. not recording video correctly or wrogn settings in driver.
As to which IQ looks better, that is entirely subjective. I would have to play the game because things like "extra detail" can look ugly in motion with increased shimmering. Smoother textures will look much better a majority of the time.
Soldato
Sapphire said to me 2 to 3 weeks for Trixx support to be released, not sure how that relates to AB and GPU Tweak.
Associate
I can't believe people are still arguing about this based on the same low quality video. It's been cut up and edited together, compressed and then captured in a pause frame with all sorts of blur going on and blown up. It is completely useless. You also have no idea of the settings of each card.
As i said before i'm certainly no expert but it is so obvious that you cannot make a fair comparison.
I barely looked at the image before, just gone back and had a good look. PMSL, how insane must some people be if they are really basing hose youtube captures as any kind of comparison.
The whole thing is destroyed by horrendous video compression and blurring.
lets see static side by side screen shot, no video malarkey at all.
Absolutely ridiculous the nonesense some fanboys will try to parse off.
Soldato
Not at all, all very valid points.
You can even see it, very clearly while the video is in motion. If what you saying is true then it would be same for either card.. Seeing has Greg pointed out what he used and what settings was used we do know what was used.
Uploading a video to youtube sure has reduced IQ but it doesn't in anyway remove texture LOD like seen in the footage..
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,868
They'd be *mad* not to update them for the Fury (non-X) release on the 14th...
Soldato
Been asking for screenshot, but credit to Greg he doesn't want to be involved in this..
Lets look at another user, claiming his old screenshots on a 780 shows the same thing. So DP would you like to be the first user to head to that point and take a screenshot?
Regarding the white lines next to the kerb, looking back through some old screenshots from last year when I was running a 780. They look very much the same as the image above for the tx.
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=28261618&postcount=35
Soldato
As D.P and others keep ignoring. The cards ran at the same in game settings with the drivers left at stock.
Both plays were recorded with the same hardware at the same settings.
If compression artifacts and youtube reencoding were going to effect the image quality then it would effect BOTH halves of the video equally. Not 'Oh lets blur and reduce the quality of the TX side more. All while making it appear that the TX is not rendering at the same LOD.'
It shows in the video and not just the still. The character runs at the same speed in both videos and greg is not erratically moving the camera around on either. So in game blur is not the cause.
Both plays were recorded with the same hardware at the same settings.
If compression artifacts and youtube reencoding were going to effect the image quality then it would effect BOTH halves of the video equally. Not 'Oh lets blur and reduce the quality of the TX side more. All while making it appear that the TX is not rendering at the same LOD.'
It shows in the video and not just the still. The character runs at the same speed in both videos and greg is not erratically moving the camera around on either. So in game blur is not the cause.
Soldato
He is, he redone this run a couple times already.. The settings was already saved to Ultra, clocking no will just keep what was already saved..
Plus he already stated that both runs was on max settings at 1080p.
Soldato
Because the settings were already selected. If the settings are already set then you can escape the screen quicker by selecting no.
Tell you what, Lets settle this. Someone with a fury X and a Ti take a screen shot roughly at the same location. It will then be obvious? No video compression, nothing and plain for all to see.
Soldato
Yess, DP would you like to upload a screenshot?
Actually we need two sets of screenshots. one set stationary and the other in motion. All the still screenies being compared on the youtube vid were under motion.