The Fury(X) Fiji Owners Thread

[humbug]

https://flic.kr/p/w9usRF

I remember someone was talking about the temps of the fury x

48c at folding, thats astonishing.

 

[Silent_Scone]

Spoiler

What now?

lol, any use out of it?

 

[andybird123]

.

So what if it's 5fps slower than another card, when your running Freesync or gsync at 1440p your probably averaging enough to be in the sync range of the game so more fps is negligible at that point and only serves a purpose to make someone feel a bit superior while gaining zero actual real world benefits whatsoever.

Its not 5fps, an averagely overclocked 980ti is about 20-30% faster than a FuryX, meaning ~30fps at 1440

And yes, although not as pronounced, I can tell the difference between a constant 100fps and a constant 70fps even with gsync

 

[ALXAndy]

Spoiler

What now?

A new camera, perhaps?

 

[LoadsaMoney]

Come now, that aint fair, an overclocked card against a stock one, you know for a fact if the tables were turned, there would be hell on here from the Nvidia crowd, as there has been in the past when its been done.

 

[humbug]

Its not 5fps, an averagely overclocked 980ti is about 20-30% faster than a FuryX, meaning ~30fps at 1440

And yes, although not as pronounced, I can tell the difference between a constant 100fps and a constant 70fps even with gsync

My overclocked 290 is way faster than a GTX 970. what a truly astonishing thing..... R9 290 FTW eh?

 

[uksoldierboy]

Its not 5fps, an averagely overclocked 980ti is about 20-30% faster than a FuryX, meaning ~30fps at 1440

And yes, although not as pronounced, I can tell the difference between a constant 100fps and a constant 70fps even with gsync

CROCK OF CRAP

Please runs these games using your 980Ti benchmark them, then i'll do the same.

Edit- Overclocked the 980Ti is faster, but you seem to think it's faster in everything and it's really not.

 

[Silent_Scone]

My FS comparison with joshy Ocuk with both cards overclocked (his CPU on LN2) got conveniently bypassed.

Not that it matters

 

[LtMatt]

CROCK OF CRAP

Please runs these games using your 980Ti benchmark them, then i'll do the same.

I'll have some of that too. We've got plenty of gaming bench threads here at OcuK with built in benchmark tools for consistency, pick a few. 30% is certainly some claim!

Links to useful benches.

Alien Isolation Benchmark

Arion Benchmark

Batman Arkham Origins Benchmark

BioShock Infinite Benchmark

Catzilla 1.0 Benchmark Scores

Civilization: Beyond Earth Benchmark

CompuBench

ComputeMark Benchmark

Dirt 3 Benchmark

Dirt Rally Benchmark

Dirt Showdown Benchmark

Dragon Age Inquisition Benchmark

Grid Autosport Benchmark

Hitman Benchmark

LuxMark 2.0 Benchmark

Middle Earth: Shadow of Mordor

Monster Hunter 1080p and Higher

Rat GPU Benchmark

Sleeping Dogs

Sniper Elite V2 Benchmark

Sniper Elite V3 Benchmark

Thief Benchmark

Tomb Raider Ultra Bench
​

 

[Lokken86]

Its not 5fps, an averagely overclocked 980ti is about 20-30% faster than a FuryX, meaning ~30fps at 1440

And yes, although not as pronounced, I can tell the difference between a constant 100fps and a constant 70fps even with gsync

20-30% would not give 30fps more unless you've got 150fps. At 1440p not likely buddy. Try 10fps.

 

[Wilko_Dog]

Its not 5fps, an averagely overclocked 980ti is about 20-30% faster than a FuryX, meaning ~30fps at 1440

And yes, although not as pronounced, I can tell the difference between a constant 100fps and a constant 70fps even with gsync

I call b******t ... there's no difference in playing at all as long as it's consistent and stable , above 60 .. well not in my eyes anyway even when playing on my mates 144hz screen as well as my normal 60 hz ...

 

[andybird123]

CROCK OF CRAP

Please runs these games using your 980Ti benchmark them, then i'll do the same.

Edit- Overclocked the 980Ti is faster, but you seem to think it's faster in everything and it's really not.

Theres any number of tricks you could pull to try to show your card as being as fast or faster, the nature of independent reviews is that they use the same system, the same settings and the same bench run. I'm not going to even attempt to repeat pages and pages of work that other people have already done.

 

[andybird123]

20-30% would not give 30fps more unless you've got 150fps. At 1440p not likely buddy. Try 10fps.

10% difference at 100fps is 10fps
That's the nature of percent, it means per hundred, so if you use 100fps as the baseline then however many percent it is results in that many fps

70fps plus 30% is 91fps

 

[RavenXXX2]

Theres any number of tricks you could pull to try to show your card as being as fast or faster, the nature of independent reviews is that they use the same system, the same settings and the same bench run. I'm not going to even attempt to repeat pages and pages of work that other people have already done.

What are you saying anybird? that AMD users are potentially bias when benching their cards against nvidia.

 

[Silent_Scone]

What are you saying anybird? that AMD users are potentially bias when benching their cards against nvidia.

No, you've totally misunderstood what he was saying

 

[humbug]

Theres any number of tricks you could pull to try to show your card as being as fast or faster, the nature of independent reviews is that they use the same system, the same settings and the same bench run. I'm not going to even attempt to repeat pages and pages of work that other people have already done.

AMD users don't have Nvidia Inspector...

 

[Silent_Scone]

AMD users don't have Nvidia Inspector...

They don't currently have cards either. They also have tessellation Factor dials to counteract inefficiency, but nice try lol.


Let's go round in circles

 

[LoadsaMoney]

They don't currently have cards either.

This did make me lol

 

[Firefox35]

I'll have some of that too. We've got plenty of gaming bench threads here at OcuK with built in benchmark tools for consistency, pick a few. 30% is certainly some claim!

Sorry Matt but you constantly ask people to benchmark their Nvidia cards against AMD featured games, talk about cherry picking at its best.

I like the Fury X, I would not have a pair in my main rig, a) because of the stupid decision to ommit HDMI 2 support and b) because I game at 4K so ideally would need 2 Fury X's but then I am at the mercy of AMD and mostly terrible crossfire support for the latest games (elite dangerous anyone)

Thats why I have a pair of 980ti's but would still like to get another Fury X for my other rig when they become readily available

 

[Silent_Scone]

It's tit for tat, right now there's a big hole of a problem that's waiting to get filled - let's not instigate that problem by trying to say one card is % faster than another.